795459484F5E49090A3B0 wrote: You know, we're 23-30 in our last 46 games. That doesn't sound all that great, but that's more than 25% of the year at an 87 win clip.
Something is amiss with that math.
Fixed. Good catch. Thanks.
Next 7 games...
Moderators: SammyKhalifa, Doc, Bobster
Next 7 games...
1C1417203613343B550 wrote: You know, we're 23-30 in our last 46 games. That doesn't sound all that great, but that's more than 25% of the year at an 87 win clip.
Something is amiss with that math.
Fixed. Good catch. Thanks.
Not so fast there! 23+20 = 43.
Something is amiss with that math.
Fixed. Good catch. Thanks.
Not so fast there! 23+20 = 43.
Next 7 games...
I am so confused.
I didn't understand how seven games under .500 would get the Pirates to 87 wins. That is a losing record. 81-81 is .500.
I didn't understand how seven games under .500 would get the Pirates to 87 wins. That is a losing record. 81-81 is .500.
Next 7 games...
715C51404756410102330 wrote: You know, we're 23-30 in our last 46 games. That doesn't sound all that great, but that's more than 25% of the year at an 87 win clip.
Something is amiss with that math.
I thing we need to get a "math checker" on this site similar to spelling checker. Especially for a guy from Iowa! Will have Gunner look into it.
Something is amiss with that math.
I thing we need to get a "math checker" on this site similar to spelling checker. Especially for a guy from Iowa! Will have Gunner look into it.
Next 7 games...
3E353D3134352E6B6D1A233B3235357439355A0 wrote: I am so confused.
I didn't understand how seven games under .500 would get the Pirates to 87 wins. That is a losing record. 81-81 is .500.
It's no confusing at all Dogknot. If you get IABucFan's math correct and they are actually 7 game under .500 now all they have to do is go 12 games over .500 the rest of the way!
I didn't understand how seven games under .500 would get the Pirates to 87 wins. That is a losing record. 81-81 is .500.
It's no confusing at all Dogknot. If you get IABucFan's math correct and they are actually 7 game under .500 now all they have to do is go 12 games over .500 the rest of the way!
Next 7 games...
25040C250E06610 wrote: I am so confused.
I didn't understand how seven games under .500 would get the Pirates to 87 wins. That is a losing record. 81-81 is .500.
It's no confusing at all Dogknot. If you get IABucFan's math correct and they are actually 7 game under .500 now all they have to do is go 12 games over .500 the rest of the way!
I didn't understand how seven games under .500 would get the Pirates to 87 wins. That is a losing record. 81-81 is .500.
It's no confusing at all Dogknot. If you get IABucFan's math correct and they are actually 7 game under .500 now all they have to do is go 12 games over .500 the rest of the way!
Next 7 games...
795459484F5E49090A3B0 wrote: You know, we're 23-30 in our last 46 games. That doesn't sound all that great, but that's more than 25% of the year at an 87 win clip.
Something is amiss with that math.
Fixed. Good catch. Thanks.
Not so fast there! 23+20 = 43.
Sheesh... ::)
Something is amiss with that math.
Fixed. Good catch. Thanks.
Not so fast there! 23+20 = 43.
Sheesh... ::)