5F5A5D5B5359405D5447414C350 wrote: The Weirton Medical Center describes itself as a nonprofit. I'd be more impressed if they were boycotting with their own money instead of someone else's.
It raises an interesting legal question: any advertising dollars they spend would have to be for the good of the organization. It's hard to find a connection between that and the trade of a ballplayer.
Could be they are going to spend advertising dollars in other places. I didn't really see that in the story. They got some free pr for doing this too. Of course, a lot of Bob Nutting fans may say, I'm going to go to a different medical center.
[highlight][highlight]
[/highlight][/highlight]..
explains why there isn't a downside to Weirton's statement.
Newspaper advertiser boycott over McCutchen trade
Moderators: SammyKhalifa, Doc, Bobster
Newspaper advertiser boycott over McCutchen trade
21120E0F0C04320F1408131405090E600 wrote: The Weirton Medical Center describes itself as a nonprofit. I'd be more impressed if they were boycotting with their own money instead of someone else's.
It raises an interesting legal question: any advertising dollars they spend would have to be for the good of the organization. It's hard to find a connection between that and the trade of a ballplayer.
I'm not sure it works that way. Just look at (non-profit) Allegheny Health Care Ads.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5wVzqtU5SU
It raises an interesting legal question: any advertising dollars they spend would have to be for the good of the organization. It's hard to find a connection between that and the trade of a ballplayer.
I'm not sure it works that way. Just look at (non-profit) Allegheny Health Care Ads.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5wVzqtU5SU