Bucs
1. Cal Mitchell (L) DH
2. Bryan Reynolds (S) CF
3. Ke'Bryan Hayes (R) 3B
4. Josh VanMeter (L) 1B
5. Jack Suwinski (L) RF
6. Rodolfo Castro (S) SS
7. Tucupita Marcano (L) LF
8. Diego Castillo (R) 2B
9. Michael Perez (L) C
Zack Thompson (R) SP
Dodgers
1. Mookie Betts (R) RF
2. Freddie Freeman (L) 1B
3. Trea Turner (R) SS
4. Will Smith (R) C
5. Edwin Rios (L) DH
6. Justin Turner (R) 3B
7. Gavin Lux (L) LF
8. Kevin Pillar (R) CF
9. Hanser Alberto (R) 2B
Walker Beuhler (R) SP
A late-game for me. Surg you will have to hold the fort for me tonight.
Game Thread - 5/30 - Bucs @ Dodgers
Moderators: SammyKhalifa, Doc, Bobster
-
Bobster21
Game Thread - 5/30 - Bucs @ Dodgers
The 4-5-6 batters are hitting .211, .180 and .170.
-
GreenWeenie
- Posts: 4012
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2020 3:47 pm
-
fjk090852-7
- Posts: 3481
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 2:52 pm
Game Thread - 5/30 - Bucs @ Dodgers
537E73626574632320110 wrote: The 4-5-6 batters are hitting .211, .180 and .170.
This entire lineup except for Hayes is really bad. I expect a loss tonight.
This entire lineup except for Hayes is really bad. I expect a loss tonight.
Game Thread - 5/30 - Bucs @ Dodgers
Looks like a winner to me! Let's Go Bucs!!!
For all the complaining about who plays and doesn't, I'm upset that we have a guy who can't swing a bat on the bench, and isn't really all that great defensively either. Why isn't Chavis on the IL?
For all the complaining about who plays and doesn't, I'm upset that we have a guy who can't swing a bat on the bench, and isn't really all that great defensively either. Why isn't Chavis on the IL?
-
Bobster21
Game Thread - 5/30 - Bucs @ Dodgers
7D5B5C49404C5B4D452E0 wrote: Looks like a winner to me! Let's Go Bucs!!!
For all the complaining about who plays and doesn't, I'm upset that we have a guy who can't swing a bat on the bench, and isn't really all that great defensively either. Why isn't Chavis on the IL?
They don't think he'll need 10 days to recover.
For all the complaining about who plays and doesn't, I'm upset that we have a guy who can't swing a bat on the bench, and isn't really all that great defensively either. Why isn't Chavis on the IL?
They don't think he'll need 10 days to recover.
Game Thread - 5/30 - Bucs @ Dodgers
6C414C5D5A4B5C1C1F2E0 wrote: Looks like a winner to me! Let's Go Bucs!!!
For all the complaining about who plays and doesn't, I'm upset that we have a guy who can't swing a bat on the bench, and isn't really all that great defensively either. Why isn't Chavis on the IL?
They don't think he'll need 10 days to recover.
they don't think he will need 10 days to recover but still had to get Chang? It just seems senseless. I could see wanting him if he hit in the minors but he didn't. Maybe they want him to make Van Meter look better.
For all the complaining about who plays and doesn't, I'm upset that we have a guy who can't swing a bat on the bench, and isn't really all that great defensively either. Why isn't Chavis on the IL?
They don't think he'll need 10 days to recover.
they don't think he will need 10 days to recover but still had to get Chang? It just seems senseless. I could see wanting him if he hit in the minors but he didn't. Maybe they want him to make Van Meter look better.
-
Bobster21
Game Thread - 5/30 - Bucs @ Dodgers
113736213727540 wrote: Looks like a winner to me! Let's Go Bucs!!!
For all the complaining about who plays and doesn't, I'm upset that we have a guy who can't swing a bat on the bench, and isn't really all that great defensively either. Why isn't Chavis on the IL?
They don't think he'll need 10 days to recover.
they don't think he will need 10 days to recover but still had to get Chang? It just seems senseless. I could see wanting him if he hit in the minors but he didn't. Maybe they want him to make Van Meter look better.
So many of their decisions defy logic and then don't work out anyway.
For all the complaining about who plays and doesn't, I'm upset that we have a guy who can't swing a bat on the bench, and isn't really all that great defensively either. Why isn't Chavis on the IL?
They don't think he'll need 10 days to recover.
they don't think he will need 10 days to recover but still had to get Chang? It just seems senseless. I could see wanting him if he hit in the minors but he didn't. Maybe they want him to make Van Meter look better.
So many of their decisions defy logic and then don't work out anyway.
Game Thread - 5/30 - Bucs @ Dodgers
537E73626574632320110 wrote: Looks like a winner to me! Let's Go Bucs!!!
For all the complaining about who plays and doesn't, I'm upset that we have a guy who can't swing a bat on the bench, and isn't really all that great defensively either. Why isn't Chavis on the IL?
They don't think he'll need 10 days to recover.
they don't think he will need 10 days to recover but still had to get Chang? It just seems senseless. I could see wanting him if he hit in the minors but he didn't. Maybe they want him to make Van Meter look better.
So many of their decisions defy logic and then don't work out anyway.
the line ups don't make much sense either. In the olden days players usually hit in a certain spot or close to it. The only constant is the catcher hits 8 or 9th. I just don't see how the way the team is managed is helping any player get established or prepared for the future. At this time next year the only players likely to be in the line up are Reynolds and Hayes, maybe Suwinksi and Mitchell (because of the homer I'll add Marcano!).
For all the complaining about who plays and doesn't, I'm upset that we have a guy who can't swing a bat on the bench, and isn't really all that great defensively either. Why isn't Chavis on the IL?
They don't think he'll need 10 days to recover.
they don't think he will need 10 days to recover but still had to get Chang? It just seems senseless. I could see wanting him if he hit in the minors but he didn't. Maybe they want him to make Van Meter look better.
So many of their decisions defy logic and then don't work out anyway.
the line ups don't make much sense either. In the olden days players usually hit in a certain spot or close to it. The only constant is the catcher hits 8 or 9th. I just don't see how the way the team is managed is helping any player get established or prepared for the future. At this time next year the only players likely to be in the line up are Reynolds and Hayes, maybe Suwinksi and Mitchell (because of the homer I'll add Marcano!).