OnlyBucs

514A47464F434C220 wrote: Assuming a shortened season will be played, I suggest we use the winning percentages indicated by the predictions that are provided. We can also prorate the number of runs if a tiebreaker is needed. For instance if 5/6ths of the games are played, we can take 5/6ths of the total runs predicted as the tiebreaker. If anyone has a better idea, feel free to present it.   
_______

I agree that wp is the way to do it.  However, just from the experience of running a poll like this, we may have to go out 6 or 7 decimal points on the wp to determine the winner.


Sure. WP is always indicated by 3 digits, rounding the final digit. But when 2 or more are equal, you have to take it out to as many decimals places as necessary to separate them.

40-96, .294

I predict there will be a MLB season but only 100 games and our beloved BUCS will go:



39-61 389 runs

5542544401070006000E370 wrote: I predict there will be a MLB season but only 100 games and our beloved BUCS will go:



39-61 389 runs


Welcome, Champ. Glad to connect with you again. You're in good company here.

7A6D7B6B2E282F292F21180 wrote: I predict there will be a MLB season but only 100 games and our beloved BUCS will go:



39-61 389 runs


Champs! Good to see you

Yikes. Found an old sports section. Didn't realize how bad the BUCS record was for spring training. I know they don't count but it looks like it would have been a long season. Maybe it's best for me because I see the Phillies were on top. Not my favorite team.



I still say there will be a shortened season. I actually think the attendance will be decent regardless of how bad they are. Pretty sure every home game will have a promo and people will want to get the hell out of the house.

7C515C4D4A5B4C0C0F3E0 wrote: Assuming a shortened season will be played, I suggest we use the winning percentages indicated by the predictions that are provided. We can also prorate the number of runs if a tiebreaker is needed. For instance if 5/6ths of the games are played, we can take 5/6ths of the total runs predicted as the tiebreaker. If anyone has a better idea, feel free to present it.   
_______

I agree that wp is the way to do it.  However, just from the experience of running a poll like this, we may have to go out 6 or 7 decimal points on the wp to determine the winner.


Sure. WP is always indicated by 3 digits, rounding the final digit. But when 2 or more are equal, you have to take it out to as many decimals places as necessary to separate them.


38-62

385

time for a new 60 season poll?

313620282631767A03242E222A2F6D202C2E430 wrote: time for a new 60 season poll?




10-15 rest of season cancelled because of too many virus cases.

20-40...and I actually think I'm being generous. I could honestly see them going 15-45. I think this team is absolutely atrocious. I see no reason for optimism among this group. I think Fangraphs has them at 27-33. No way. Below average everywhere but 1B/DH...backups at CF and C. The other "starters" wouldn't start for most big league teams. Rotation is a joke. Bullpen is the only thing that makes the rotation look semi-respectable. And that’s not a compliment. It’s like saying, “Next to the asteroid taking out our planet, this whole COVID thing ain’t half bad.” (Bonus points if you have “killer asteroid” on your Hunger Games 2020 Bingo card). Like I said...20-40, but I honestly think it will be closer to 17-43. If everything breaks wrong, and let's be honest...when DOESN'T it break wrong with this team...they could lose 45.