Re: The Other Games 2024
Posted: Wed Aug 21, 2024 3:20 pm
White Sox magic number is 3 after their 97th loss last night
They'd make excellent yinzers.Wildwoodcoach wrote: ↑Wed Aug 21, 2024 3:24 pm I have been told by a Giants fan that the their message board is none to happy
how the Giants just let Joey Bart get away. Probably the same fans who booed him
Joey Votto was terrific, one of the best players of his time. But is he a Hall of Famer? His numbers look like this:
I just read a piece on mlb.com regarding this very subject, and it may have changed my mind. I'm older, so things like batting average, career hits, and HRs still are important to me. I realize that things like OBP, SLG, and OPS are now the more important measurements, and I understand why and actually don't disagree. In the counting stats, Votto comes up short, but in the analytics stats, he deserves to be in the Hall. As I said before, he was one of the best players of his era. I wouldn't have a sound argument against it if he's voted in.Doc wrote: ↑Thu Aug 22, 2024 12:47 amJoey Votto was terrific, one of the best players of his time. But is he a Hall of Famer? His numbers look like this:
17 years
2135 Hits
459 Doubles
356 HRs
1144 RBIs
.294 BA
.409 OBP
.511 SLG
.920 OPS
As much as I liked him as a player, I think he falls a bit short. I do admit that he has better numbers than some who’re already in the Hall so, if he were to one day be admitted by way of the Veterans Committee, I’d probably have no problem with that.
I see it a little differently. I'm more interested in season's stats that career cumulative stats because some players add to their totals by hanging on too long. I'm more impressed by all the great seasons Hank Aaron had than by the fact that he had 755 HRs instead of 733 by playing 2 very poor seasons at ages 41-42 before retiring.Doc wrote: ↑Thu Aug 22, 2024 9:27 amI just read a piece on mlb.com regarding this very subject, and it may have changed my mind. I'm older, so things like batting average, career hits, and HRs still are important to me. I realize that things like OBP, SLG, and OPS are now the more important measurements, and I understand why and actually don't disagree. In the counting stats, Votto comes up short, but in the analytics stats, he deserves to be in the Hall. As I said before, he was one of the best players of his era. I wouldn't have a sound argument against it if he's voted in.Doc wrote: ↑Thu Aug 22, 2024 12:47 amJoey Votto was terrific, one of the best players of his time. But is he a Hall of Famer? His numbers look like this:
17 years
2135 Hits
459 Doubles
356 HRs
1144 RBIs
.294 BA
.409 OBP
.511 SLG
.920 OPS
As much as I liked him as a player, I think he falls a bit short. I do admit that he has better numbers than some who’re already in the Hall so, if he were to one day be admitted by way of the Veterans Committee, I’d probably have no problem with that.