Page 18 of 22

Quintana

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2017 3:01 pm
by Buccos1313
666D65696C6D763335427B636A6D6D2C616D020 wrote: Yesterday Glasnow was listed as the second best right handed pitching prospect in baseball. Also Nick Keller was listed as just missing the top ten list. As we get closer to spring training I am thinking the Bucs should hold onto their high end prospects and not acquire Quintana.


Was Michael Kopech #1?



http://m.mlb.com/cutfour/2017/01/17/213 ... ew-110-mph



I never heard of this test (the running star part), but I wonder where other players would be on the radar gun.


The ranking I saw had Reyes from St.L. Ranked number 1 RHSP

Quintana

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2017 5:58 pm
by notes34
474C44484D4C571214635A424B4C4C0D404C230 wrote: Yesterday Glasnow was listed as the second best right handed pitching prospect in baseball. Also Nick Keller was listed as just missing the top ten list. As we get closer to spring training I am thinking the Bucs should hold onto their high end prospects and not acquire Quintana.


Was Michael Kopech #1?



http://m.mlb.com/cutfour/2017/01/17/213 ... ew-110-mph



I never heard of this test (the running star part), but I wonder where other players would be on the radar gun.


He wasn't named the 2nd best RHP prospect in baseball. He was named the Pirates 2nd best RHP pitching prospect.

Quintana

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2017 6:40 pm
by OrlandoMerced
707C7D262F262E23243B21160 wrote: Yesterday Glasnow was listed as the second best right handed pitching prospect in baseball. Also Nick Keller was listed as just missing the top ten list. As we get closer to spring training I am thinking the Bucs should hold onto their high end prospects and not acquire Quintana.




MLB.com prospect pipeline did that ranking.



I still say Glasnow and one other top prospect should be the package, Meadows excluded. But if they want Glasnow and Bell, then they should expand the deal to include Frazier.



But for Quintana alone, I would do Glasnow + either Keller/Newman + 10-20 guy.

Quintana

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2017 9:32 pm
by Buccos1313
55544F5E48080F3B0 wrote: Yesterday Glasnow was listed as the second best right handed pitching prospect in baseball. Also Nick Keller was listed as just missing the top ten list. As we get closer to spring training I am thinking the Bucs should hold onto their high end prospects and not acquire Quintana.


Was Michael Kopech #1?



http://m.mlb.com/cutfour/2017/01/17/213 ... ew-110-mph



I never heard of this test (the running star part), but I wonder where other players would be on the radar gun.


He wasn't named the 2nd best RHP prospect in baseball. He was named the Pirates 2nd best RHP pitching prospect.


Yes, Glasnow was ranked the 2nd best RHP prospect in baseball.

Quintana

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2017 9:57 pm
by notes34
083F292925397B797B794A0 wrote: Yesterday Glasnow was listed as the second best right handed pitching prospect in baseball. Also Nick Keller was listed as just missing the top ten list. As we get closer to spring training I am thinking the Bucs should hold onto their high end prospects and not acquire Quintana.


Was Michael Kopech #1?



http://m.mlb.com/cutfour/2017/01/17/213 ... ew-110-mph



I never heard of this test (the running star part), but I wonder where other players would be on the radar gun.


He wasn't named the 2nd best RHP prospect in baseball. He was named the Pirates 2nd best RHP pitching prospect.


Yes, Glasnow was ranked the 2nd best RHP prospect in baseball.


You have a link for that? I'm seeing top prospects by team, and it lists Glasnow as 2nd for Pirates. Actually listed behind Keller.

Quintana

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2017 10:05 pm
by dogknot17@yahoo.co

Quintana

Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2017 5:03 pm
by dmetz
6C514F424D474C6E4651404647230 wrote:





MLB.com prospect pipeline did that ranking. 



I still say Glasnow and one other top prospect should be the package, Meadows excluded.  But if they want Glasnow and Bell, then they should expand the deal to include Frazier.



But for Quintana alone, I would do Glasnow + either Keller/Newman + 10-20 guy.


That's a good offer. I bet that when Jose Q gets traded to someone else, it will be for less perceived value than that offer.

Quintana

Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2017 5:53 pm
by SammyKhalifa
6D646C7D73090 wrote:



That's a good offer.   I bet that when Jose Q gets traded to someone else, it will be for less perceived value than that offer.   




As perceived by who, though?  As people have been discussing in another thread, it'll just be a new Rorschach test that only reaveals what people wanted to believe to be true in the first place.   

Quintana

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 3:10 pm
by dogknot17@yahoo.co
No new news on Quintana. Last rumor report I read was from January 6th. Who is going to give in first? I really doubt he will be with the White Sox.

Quintana

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 3:33 pm
by mouse
I doubt he will be with them in the long term, but I could see them looking again at the trade deadline. Teams are desperate then, which usually means nice offers.