666D65696C6D763335427B636A6D6D2C616D020 wrote: Yesterday Glasnow was listed as the second best right handed pitching prospect in baseball. Also Nick Keller was listed as just missing the top ten list. As we get closer to spring training I am thinking the Bucs should hold onto their high end prospects and not acquire Quintana.
Was Michael Kopech #1?
http://m.mlb.com/cutfour/2017/01/17/213 ... ew-110-mph
I never heard of this test (the running star part), but I wonder where other players would be on the radar gun.
The ranking I saw had Reyes from St.L. Ranked number 1 RHSP
Quintana
Moderators: SammyKhalifa, Doc, Bobster
Quintana
474C44484D4C571214635A424B4C4C0D404C230 wrote: Yesterday Glasnow was listed as the second best right handed pitching prospect in baseball. Also Nick Keller was listed as just missing the top ten list. As we get closer to spring training I am thinking the Bucs should hold onto their high end prospects and not acquire Quintana.
Was Michael Kopech #1?
http://m.mlb.com/cutfour/2017/01/17/213 ... ew-110-mph
I never heard of this test (the running star part), but I wonder where other players would be on the radar gun.
He wasn't named the 2nd best RHP prospect in baseball. He was named the Pirates 2nd best RHP pitching prospect.
Was Michael Kopech #1?
http://m.mlb.com/cutfour/2017/01/17/213 ... ew-110-mph
I never heard of this test (the running star part), but I wonder where other players would be on the radar gun.
He wasn't named the 2nd best RHP prospect in baseball. He was named the Pirates 2nd best RHP pitching prospect.
-
OrlandoMerced
Quintana
707C7D262F262E23243B21160 wrote: Yesterday Glasnow was listed as the second best right handed pitching prospect in baseball. Also Nick Keller was listed as just missing the top ten list. As we get closer to spring training I am thinking the Bucs should hold onto their high end prospects and not acquire Quintana.
MLB.com prospect pipeline did that ranking.
I still say Glasnow and one other top prospect should be the package, Meadows excluded. But if they want Glasnow and Bell, then they should expand the deal to include Frazier.
But for Quintana alone, I would do Glasnow + either Keller/Newman + 10-20 guy.
MLB.com prospect pipeline did that ranking.
I still say Glasnow and one other top prospect should be the package, Meadows excluded. But if they want Glasnow and Bell, then they should expand the deal to include Frazier.
But for Quintana alone, I would do Glasnow + either Keller/Newman + 10-20 guy.
-
Buccos1313
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 9:22 pm
Quintana
55544F5E48080F3B0 wrote: Yesterday Glasnow was listed as the second best right handed pitching prospect in baseball. Also Nick Keller was listed as just missing the top ten list. As we get closer to spring training I am thinking the Bucs should hold onto their high end prospects and not acquire Quintana.
Was Michael Kopech #1?
http://m.mlb.com/cutfour/2017/01/17/213 ... ew-110-mph
I never heard of this test (the running star part), but I wonder where other players would be on the radar gun.
He wasn't named the 2nd best RHP prospect in baseball. He was named the Pirates 2nd best RHP pitching prospect.
Yes, Glasnow was ranked the 2nd best RHP prospect in baseball.
Was Michael Kopech #1?
http://m.mlb.com/cutfour/2017/01/17/213 ... ew-110-mph
I never heard of this test (the running star part), but I wonder where other players would be on the radar gun.
He wasn't named the 2nd best RHP prospect in baseball. He was named the Pirates 2nd best RHP pitching prospect.
Yes, Glasnow was ranked the 2nd best RHP prospect in baseball.
Quintana
083F292925397B797B794A0 wrote: Yesterday Glasnow was listed as the second best right handed pitching prospect in baseball. Also Nick Keller was listed as just missing the top ten list. As we get closer to spring training I am thinking the Bucs should hold onto their high end prospects and not acquire Quintana.
Was Michael Kopech #1?
http://m.mlb.com/cutfour/2017/01/17/213 ... ew-110-mph
I never heard of this test (the running star part), but I wonder where other players would be on the radar gun.
He wasn't named the 2nd best RHP prospect in baseball. He was named the Pirates 2nd best RHP pitching prospect.
Yes, Glasnow was ranked the 2nd best RHP prospect in baseball.
You have a link for that? I'm seeing top prospects by team, and it lists Glasnow as 2nd for Pirates. Actually listed behind Keller.
Was Michael Kopech #1?
http://m.mlb.com/cutfour/2017/01/17/213 ... ew-110-mph
I never heard of this test (the running star part), but I wonder where other players would be on the radar gun.
He wasn't named the 2nd best RHP prospect in baseball. He was named the Pirates 2nd best RHP pitching prospect.
Yes, Glasnow was ranked the 2nd best RHP prospect in baseball.
You have a link for that? I'm seeing top prospects by team, and it lists Glasnow as 2nd for Pirates. Actually listed behind Keller.
Quintana
6C514F424D474C6E4651404647230 wrote:
MLB.com prospect pipeline did that ranking.
I still say Glasnow and one other top prospect should be the package, Meadows excluded. But if they want Glasnow and Bell, then they should expand the deal to include Frazier.
But for Quintana alone, I would do Glasnow + either Keller/Newman + 10-20 guy.
That's a good offer. I bet that when Jose Q gets traded to someone else, it will be for less perceived value than that offer.
MLB.com prospect pipeline did that ranking.
I still say Glasnow and one other top prospect should be the package, Meadows excluded. But if they want Glasnow and Bell, then they should expand the deal to include Frazier.
But for Quintana alone, I would do Glasnow + either Keller/Newman + 10-20 guy.
That's a good offer. I bet that when Jose Q gets traded to someone else, it will be for less perceived value than that offer.
-
SammyKhalifa
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2016 4:19 am
Quintana
6D646C7D73090 wrote:
That's a good offer. I bet that when Jose Q gets traded to someone else, it will be for less perceived value than that offer.
As perceived by who, though? As people have been discussing in another thread, it'll just be a new Rorschach test that only reaveals what people wanted to believe to be true in the first place.
That's a good offer. I bet that when Jose Q gets traded to someone else, it will be for less perceived value than that offer.
As perceived by who, though? As people have been discussing in another thread, it'll just be a new Rorschach test that only reaveals what people wanted to believe to be true in the first place.