2016 trade deadline
Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2016 8:57 am
4E495F57594E09057C5B515D5550125F53513C0 wrote: ........
If we ever want to get something for Melancon, this is the time. But this bullpen has been so iffy, can we get something to solidify it, slide Watson into the closer slot get something valuable for the longer term for Melancon?
If we bring Bell up then either Freese or Jaso is expendable. Do we move one of those two for a bullpen arm and bring Bell up for the rest of the year? Jaso seems to be struggling at the plate, but Freese might have some decent value to the right team. He's been steady and can play a couple of positions.
I'd like to see us go through some of the growing pains we surely face with call-ups -- Bell and Glasnow -- this season and maybe get something interesting at the deadline that solidifies us for next year.
It looks to be a sellers year with so many possible wildcard teams still in contention in the AL. Who knows what we might get. Melancon is a really decent chip...
Gunner, thanks! First post on the new board. Glad to be back!
A couple of interesting comments to follow up on:
I had not thought of this, but I agree about Bell - he probably needs some meaningful bats this summer to prepare for NEXT year. So somebody has to go. My guess is Freese. Too bad, he's done a nice job.
I had not considered the idea that this could be a sellers market. That would certainly increase the value of Melancon. But if the Pirates are in the playoff hunt, can they possibly justify a trade? They may have to face Mark in a playoff situation....
If it were me I would get rid of Jaso. Yes, he is a great story with his almost seamless move from C-DH to 1B, he finds ways to get on base, even hits a long ball once in awhile, finally has great hair.
I keep Freese around because he offers decent ability to get on base, hits for more power than Jaso and can play several places on defense.
But I guess we just wait and see what the market for each is. If Freese brings some long term help in the BP then maybe his is the one to go. Don't see Jaso bringing much in return though.
If we ever want to get something for Melancon, this is the time. But this bullpen has been so iffy, can we get something to solidify it, slide Watson into the closer slot get something valuable for the longer term for Melancon?
If we bring Bell up then either Freese or Jaso is expendable. Do we move one of those two for a bullpen arm and bring Bell up for the rest of the year? Jaso seems to be struggling at the plate, but Freese might have some decent value to the right team. He's been steady and can play a couple of positions.
I'd like to see us go through some of the growing pains we surely face with call-ups -- Bell and Glasnow -- this season and maybe get something interesting at the deadline that solidifies us for next year.
It looks to be a sellers year with so many possible wildcard teams still in contention in the AL. Who knows what we might get. Melancon is a really decent chip...
Gunner, thanks! First post on the new board. Glad to be back!
A couple of interesting comments to follow up on:
I had not thought of this, but I agree about Bell - he probably needs some meaningful bats this summer to prepare for NEXT year. So somebody has to go. My guess is Freese. Too bad, he's done a nice job.
I had not considered the idea that this could be a sellers market. That would certainly increase the value of Melancon. But if the Pirates are in the playoff hunt, can they possibly justify a trade? They may have to face Mark in a playoff situation....
If it were me I would get rid of Jaso. Yes, he is a great story with his almost seamless move from C-DH to 1B, he finds ways to get on base, even hits a long ball once in awhile, finally has great hair.
I keep Freese around because he offers decent ability to get on base, hits for more power than Jaso and can play several places on defense.
But I guess we just wait and see what the market for each is. If Freese brings some long term help in the BP then maybe his is the one to go. Don't see Jaso bringing much in return though.