QO to be 16.7MM next year
Moderators: SammyKhalifa, Doc, Bobster
-
- Posts: 3642
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2016 4:19 am
QO to be 16.7MM next year
Would you extend to Melancon at that? I wouldn't. I think I'd keep my ear to the ground regarding offers if the pitching trade market remains so seller-friendly.
QO to be 16.7MM next year
Might have to offer him that.
It will depend on who else you bring in. Individually, he wouldn't be worth $16 million (no relief pitcher is worth that), but if you package him and another guy for like $19 million, might be worth it.
If the Pirates fall out of it, I think Melancon will be a waiver deal. That sucks because you don't get too much in return usually, but better than nothing.
It will depend on who else you bring in. Individually, he wouldn't be worth $16 million (no relief pitcher is worth that), but if you package him and another guy for like $19 million, might be worth it.
If the Pirates fall out of it, I think Melancon will be a waiver deal. That sucks because you don't get too much in return usually, but better than nothing.
-
- Posts: 3642
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2016 4:19 am
QO to be 16.7MM next year
Now I suppose we could try to re-sign him after the year, though it's not likely. I think that if we were to offer him that qualifying offer he takes it and runs, because nobody's going to pay 16.7 plus a first rounder for MM.
QO to be 16.7MM next year
If you do trade Melancon you better make damn sure you get back at least a quality to above average Major League starting pitcher, and at least one AAA player that is pretty close to being Major League ready. If you can guarantee me I would get both of those back I would very much consider dealing Melancon.
-
- Posts: 3642
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2016 4:19 am
QO to be 16.7MM next year
5E79686C69744B7F686969740D0 wrote: If you do trade Melancon you better make damn sure you get back at least a quality to above average Major League starting pitcher, and at least one AAA player that is pretty close to being Major League ready. If you can guarantee me I would get both of those back I would very much consider dealing Melancon.
I'd want a solid bullpen guy with multiple years either as part of this or a different deal. I don't think you'd get a starter but who knows. I was ready to just let the season ride out with him here, but if the returns for trades continue to be high I'd be willing to adjust.
I'd want a solid bullpen guy with multiple years either as part of this or a different deal. I don't think you'd get a starter but who knows. I was ready to just let the season ride out with him here, but if the returns for trades continue to be high I'd be willing to adjust.
QO to be 16.7MM next year
685A56564270535A57525D5A3B0 wrote: Now I suppose we could try to re-sign him after the year, though it's not likely. I think that if we were to offer him that qualifying offer he takes it and runs, because nobody's going to pay 16.7 plus a first rounder for MM.
I'm hoping the pirates extend Mark 2 years. I want the best closer in the business in 17 and 18. Mark is the best in the game.
I have no idea what it would take to extend him, but it won't be $16.5M. I bet he'd take a bit less to remain with the Pirates.
I'm hoping the pirates extend Mark 2 years. I want the best closer in the business in 17 and 18. Mark is the best in the game.
I have no idea what it would take to extend him, but it won't be $16.5M. I bet he'd take a bit less to remain with the Pirates.
-
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2016 9:57 pm
QO to be 16.7MM next year
331405010419261205040419600 wrote: If you do trade Melancon you better make damn sure you get back at least a quality to above average Major League starting pitcher, and at least one AAA player that is pretty close to being Major League ready. If you can guarantee me I would get both of those back I would very much consider dealing Melancon.
There is no chance you would get that return.
There is no chance you would get that return.
QO to be 16.7MM next year
Agree.
Closers are still failed Starters. Teams want Starters first.
Closers are still failed Starters. Teams want Starters first.