Power Hungry
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2017 1:40 pm
Since the end of the season I have been consumed by the Bucs' lack of power. This weekend I did a little study on what our power shortage is likely costing us. Listed below is a chart of 2017 HR numbers by teams in the Central Division:
Team 2017 Rec 2017 HR 2015 HR %Increase
Cubs 92-70 223 171 30%
Milw 86-76 224 145 54%
STL 83-79 196 137 43%
PIT 75-87 151 140 8%
Cin 70-92 219 167 31%
Key Points--
1. The last thing I discovered in my review, but the first thing I will point out, is how much our divisional rivals have increased their power in just 2 seasons compared to the Bucs.
2. It surprised me that the Bucs actually hit 11 more HR in 2017 than in 2015, when they won 98 games.
3. The Cardinals only hit 137 HR in 2015 when they won 100 games.
The next chart shows the impact of W/L records to HR hit per game:
Team 2017 Records by game with:
0 or 1HR 2or>HR 1or>HR Win%
Cubs 43-55 49-15 77-37 .675
Milw 42-53 44-23 73-53 .579
STL 50-62 33-17 65-51 .560
PIT 46-82 29-5 59-42 .584
Cin 34-63 36-29 55-60 .478
1. When hitting 0 or 1 HR per game, each team had a losing record.
2. When hitting 2 or more HR, each team had a winning record. While 3 teams had more than 60 multi-HR games, and the Cards had 50, the Bucs only did so 34 times. On the positive side, no team made more of their 2HR games than the Bucs, who had a stellar .853 W/L%.
3. Finally, I backtracked and listed each team's record in games they hit at least one HR. The Bucs ranked second, winning at a .584 clip.
In summary, this study led to two obvious points: 1) The incredible power gap that has developed between the Bucs and the rest of the Division, and 2) the undeniable significance of home runs to winning. You may say but what about the Reds? Well, the Reds had a 13-6 record versus the Bucs in 2017. They were 10-1 in games they homered and 3-5 in games which they didn't homer.
My guess is the Bucs may have had another 25 HR or more in 2017 had Kang played, and Marte and Polanco played more. Hopefully, those two will produce more power in 2018, and we will find an infielder to replace Kang's HR production.
I also found the Bucs were 36-18 in one run games in 2015 and were 19-24 in 2017. While pitching surely factored into to some degree, I imagine many of those games were lost on opponent long-balls while we were straining to string together 3 singles.
Naturally, there are numerous ways to analyze, interpret, or argue some of these numbers. And I didn't touch on the impact of pitching, on-base percentage, stadiums, etc, etc. But bottom line there is a power arms race going on within the division (and most of baseball). If not, why have the Cardinals prioritized adding a middle-of-the-order slugger to a lineup that already increased its power 43% in two years? In 2017 every team in the Central Division homered in at least 13 more games than the Bucs and each had at least 16 more multi-HR games.
The Pirates don't have to have the most power in the Division but they must find a way to significantly close the gap. Sorry for the long post, but I figured you may be in the small subset of people who found this info of interest.
Team 2017 Rec 2017 HR 2015 HR %Increase
Cubs 92-70 223 171 30%
Milw 86-76 224 145 54%
STL 83-79 196 137 43%
PIT 75-87 151 140 8%
Cin 70-92 219 167 31%
Key Points--
1. The last thing I discovered in my review, but the first thing I will point out, is how much our divisional rivals have increased their power in just 2 seasons compared to the Bucs.
2. It surprised me that the Bucs actually hit 11 more HR in 2017 than in 2015, when they won 98 games.
3. The Cardinals only hit 137 HR in 2015 when they won 100 games.
The next chart shows the impact of W/L records to HR hit per game:
Team 2017 Records by game with:
0 or 1HR 2or>HR 1or>HR Win%
Cubs 43-55 49-15 77-37 .675
Milw 42-53 44-23 73-53 .579
STL 50-62 33-17 65-51 .560
PIT 46-82 29-5 59-42 .584
Cin 34-63 36-29 55-60 .478
1. When hitting 0 or 1 HR per game, each team had a losing record.
2. When hitting 2 or more HR, each team had a winning record. While 3 teams had more than 60 multi-HR games, and the Cards had 50, the Bucs only did so 34 times. On the positive side, no team made more of their 2HR games than the Bucs, who had a stellar .853 W/L%.
3. Finally, I backtracked and listed each team's record in games they hit at least one HR. The Bucs ranked second, winning at a .584 clip.
In summary, this study led to two obvious points: 1) The incredible power gap that has developed between the Bucs and the rest of the Division, and 2) the undeniable significance of home runs to winning. You may say but what about the Reds? Well, the Reds had a 13-6 record versus the Bucs in 2017. They were 10-1 in games they homered and 3-5 in games which they didn't homer.
My guess is the Bucs may have had another 25 HR or more in 2017 had Kang played, and Marte and Polanco played more. Hopefully, those two will produce more power in 2018, and we will find an infielder to replace Kang's HR production.
I also found the Bucs were 36-18 in one run games in 2015 and were 19-24 in 2017. While pitching surely factored into to some degree, I imagine many of those games were lost on opponent long-balls while we were straining to string together 3 singles.
Naturally, there are numerous ways to analyze, interpret, or argue some of these numbers. And I didn't touch on the impact of pitching, on-base percentage, stadiums, etc, etc. But bottom line there is a power arms race going on within the division (and most of baseball). If not, why have the Cardinals prioritized adding a middle-of-the-order slugger to a lineup that already increased its power 43% in two years? In 2017 every team in the Central Division homered in at least 13 more games than the Bucs and each had at least 16 more multi-HR games.
The Pirates don't have to have the most power in the Division but they must find a way to significantly close the gap. Sorry for the long post, but I figured you may be in the small subset of people who found this info of interest.