Something to ponder
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2020 10:19 pm
We all realize that the Pirates situation is mainly due to the owner unwilling to invest in an average ML payroll. Unlike other sports there is no salary floor that would force spending to a competitive level. ML baseball cannot force Nutting to sell or reprimand him for doing what is within the guidelines of the sport.
So what are the options?
I wonder if the City of Pittsburgh can force his hand?
The city owns PNC Park. Pirates ownership has not in good faith abided by their promise to keep their key players and put a winning organization on the field in return for the city paying for a new ballpark with added luxury suite revenues.
I don’t know what the PNC lease looks like.
I wonder if it is possible for the city to claim that the Pirates have basically defaulted on the terms of the stadium deal
If so, could the city jack up the rent to a hugely inflated value with the premise that if the Pirates reinvested that increase into their player payroll then the actual rent would continue to be the same.
Just trying to think out of the box here.
So what are the options?
I wonder if the City of Pittsburgh can force his hand?
The city owns PNC Park. Pirates ownership has not in good faith abided by their promise to keep their key players and put a winning organization on the field in return for the city paying for a new ballpark with added luxury suite revenues.
I don’t know what the PNC lease looks like.
I wonder if it is possible for the city to claim that the Pirates have basically defaulted on the terms of the stadium deal
If so, could the city jack up the rent to a hugely inflated value with the premise that if the Pirates reinvested that increase into their player payroll then the actual rent would continue to be the same.
Just trying to think out of the box here.