5/4 Pirates vs Reds. Cervelli's return
Posted: Fri May 05, 2017 7:03 pm
404941505E240 wrote: This is a discussion board. I asked some questions, that was all. I am not fighting or want to fight. You can think Polanco is a bust (not saying you did, I was asking if you thought so). I just brought up McCutchen to show how he progressed and how it is very similar to Polanco so far. I thought it was a good comparison.
You can call out anyone you want. I come here for the discussion in which I enjoy.
I don't know why you don't realize that what you keep saying is statistically incorrect. 24 year old season is the only one that's even close between the two offensively, and cutch still has him clearly.
At 22 Cutch put up an .836 OPS, Polanco .650
At 23 Cutch put up an .814 OPS, Polanco .701
At 24 Cutch put up an .820 OPS, Polanco .786
At 25 thru April cutch is .723 OPS, Polanco .671
Cutch has it where it counts more too. More power (.458 slugging vs .404) much better OBP (.374 vs .318) and 2 all-stars vs 0.
Are you looking at batting average or what? Because I don't even see that.
I already posted the stats:
24 year old Polanco: 22 HR, 86 RBI, .258 ave, .373 obp, .463 slg, .786 ops
24 year old McCutchen: 23 HR, 89 RBI, .259 ave, .364 obp, .456 slg, .820 ops
You really don't see the comparison: 1 less HR, 3 less RBI, .001 difference in average, .009 difference in OBP (someone did say that stat might be wrong), .007 difference in SLG, and .034 difference in OPS.
Honestly, you don't think those stats are similar?
You can call out anyone you want. I come here for the discussion in which I enjoy.
I don't know why you don't realize that what you keep saying is statistically incorrect. 24 year old season is the only one that's even close between the two offensively, and cutch still has him clearly.
At 22 Cutch put up an .836 OPS, Polanco .650
At 23 Cutch put up an .814 OPS, Polanco .701
At 24 Cutch put up an .820 OPS, Polanco .786
At 25 thru April cutch is .723 OPS, Polanco .671
Cutch has it where it counts more too. More power (.458 slugging vs .404) much better OBP (.374 vs .318) and 2 all-stars vs 0.
Are you looking at batting average or what? Because I don't even see that.
I already posted the stats:
24 year old Polanco: 22 HR, 86 RBI, .258 ave, .373 obp, .463 slg, .786 ops
24 year old McCutchen: 23 HR, 89 RBI, .259 ave, .364 obp, .456 slg, .820 ops
You really don't see the comparison: 1 less HR, 3 less RBI, .001 difference in average, .009 difference in OBP (someone did say that stat might be wrong), .007 difference in SLG, and .034 difference in OPS.
Honestly, you don't think those stats are similar?