Kang and Gonzalez
Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2019 3:54 pm
0A272A3B3C2D3A7A79480 wrote: And you know what folks? If any of us really want to see an example of just how LOW the bar is as a Pirates Fan, here it is:
[highlight]“We feel like we got a young Freddy Galvis. His name is Erik Gonzalez,” Huntington said.[/highlight]
Freddy Galvis? That's the mark? The "old" Freddy Galvis is 29 this year. Erik Gonzalez is 27 this year.
Galvis had his first productive season as a starter last year and signed only a 1yr/ 5 million deal with the blue jays (which includes, a 2020 team option.)
Welcome to the Pittsburgh Pirates. This is normal for us. Up is down, left is right. 29 is old, 27 is "young" . our GM believes the guy we've targeted has the potential upside of a guy that signed this offseason for a more team friendly contract than we paid Sean Rodriguez the last two seasons.
Actually, Galvis has been fairly consistent these last 4 years. And he's considered one of the top fielding SSs. He hit 20 HRs in 2016. But his slash line is an unimpressive .246/.290/.374/.664. Jordy Mercer was .256/.316/.383/.699. I guess if Gonzalez can field as well as they hope and just be a slightly below average hitter, NH will have his version of Freddy Galvis. A big part of NH's job is to spin the moves they make and don't make. Equating Gonzalez to Galvis sounds better than saying they think Gonzalez will be a better fielding, worse hitting Jordy Mercer.
https://www.baseball-reference.com/play ... fr01.shtml
I get you. I don't dispute Galvis's defensive chops at all. I think that his woeful bat prior to last year made him more like a good backup quality SS than a good starter.
I found that statement cringeworthy. 2 years younger than the full version, with the full version only costing 1yr/5mil with a team option.
NH needs a PR man, badly. That's not how you talk up an acquisition. If he would have said "defensively", it would have been good.
Gonzalez is has a lot of potential. I see the potential to outhit, Jordy for sure. I like the pickup. He's got a lot of offensive potential. He's the kind of player I would take a chance on revamping his swing to get balls elevated. He makes hard contact, plays good defense and he can run a little bit. He has tools and will contribute in other ways while we try to get his swing changed.
[highlight]“We feel like we got a young Freddy Galvis. His name is Erik Gonzalez,” Huntington said.[/highlight]
Freddy Galvis? That's the mark? The "old" Freddy Galvis is 29 this year. Erik Gonzalez is 27 this year.
Galvis had his first productive season as a starter last year and signed only a 1yr/ 5 million deal with the blue jays (which includes, a 2020 team option.)
Welcome to the Pittsburgh Pirates. This is normal for us. Up is down, left is right. 29 is old, 27 is "young" . our GM believes the guy we've targeted has the potential upside of a guy that signed this offseason for a more team friendly contract than we paid Sean Rodriguez the last two seasons.
Actually, Galvis has been fairly consistent these last 4 years. And he's considered one of the top fielding SSs. He hit 20 HRs in 2016. But his slash line is an unimpressive .246/.290/.374/.664. Jordy Mercer was .256/.316/.383/.699. I guess if Gonzalez can field as well as they hope and just be a slightly below average hitter, NH will have his version of Freddy Galvis. A big part of NH's job is to spin the moves they make and don't make. Equating Gonzalez to Galvis sounds better than saying they think Gonzalez will be a better fielding, worse hitting Jordy Mercer.
https://www.baseball-reference.com/play ... fr01.shtml
I get you. I don't dispute Galvis's defensive chops at all. I think that his woeful bat prior to last year made him more like a good backup quality SS than a good starter.
I found that statement cringeworthy. 2 years younger than the full version, with the full version only costing 1yr/5mil with a team option.
NH needs a PR man, badly. That's not how you talk up an acquisition. If he would have said "defensively", it would have been good.
Gonzalez is has a lot of potential. I see the potential to outhit, Jordy for sure. I like the pickup. He's got a lot of offensive potential. He's the kind of player I would take a chance on revamping his swing to get balls elevated. He makes hard contact, plays good defense and he can run a little bit. He has tools and will contribute in other ways while we try to get his swing changed.