OnlyBucs

032E23323524337370410 wrote:



Yeah, I did/do not agree with firing either of them, and thought an extension was in order--just not such a long one.  But like dog said that won't stop them from being fired if owners feel like it.


As long as that owner doesn't mind paying the new hire as well as the guy being fired.




When Huntington and Russell were extended in 2010, Coonelly said along the lines if someone was under contract and not performing up to expectations they could be let go. Even if they have to eat their contract. And they have done this before too.

Maybe they believe in their process so much that they are willing to wait out a few losing years. I'm just not convinced that their process works.

5550575159534A575E4D4B463F0 wrote: Maybe they believe in their process so much that they are willing to wait out a few losing years.  I'm just not convinced that their process works.




Why?

6E656D6164657E3B3D4A736B6265652469650A0 wrote: Maybe they believe in their process so much that they are willing to wait out a few losing years.  I'm just not convinced that their process works.




Why?
Well explain too me why it will work again. I don't want to hear it worked 3 years in a row. Tell me why it will work again.

3E353D3134352E6B6D1A233B3235357439355A0 wrote: Maybe they believe in their process so much that they are willing to wait out a few losing years.  I'm just not convinced that their process works.




Why?


Because everyone else is doing the same thing now with more money.

7F77744355705758360 wrote: Maybe they believe in their process so much that they are willing to wait out a few losing years.  I'm just not convinced that their process works.




Why?


Because everyone else is doing the same thing now with more money.


Teams with more money are also doing a poor job drafting and developing while essentially ignoring the international market?



That doesn't sound right.