Overachiever definition: to perform better or achieve more than expected, especially by others.
Glad you defined them- might help Green Weenie to know the difference
Weenie is ready to reply that Bobster's definitions are "fake" definitions!
Over Achievers Under Achievers - Teams
Moderators: SammyKhalifa, Doc, Bobster
-
DemDog
Over Achievers Under Achievers - Teams
76484D45564E4E456540574413210 wrote: Underachiever definition: one that fails to attain a predicted level of achievement or does not do as well as expected.
Overachiever definition: to perform better or achieve more than expected, especially by others.
Glad you defined them- might help Green Weenie to know the difference
Weenie is ready to reply that Bobster's definitions are "fake" definitions!
Overachiever definition: to perform better or achieve more than expected, especially by others.
Glad you defined them- might help Green Weenie to know the difference
Weenie is ready to reply that Bobster's definitions are "fake" definitions!
-
GreenWeenie
- Posts: 4012
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2020 3:47 pm
Over Achievers Under Achievers - Teams
Yeah. And, you're ready to censor my response.
-
GreenWeenie
- Posts: 4012
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2020 3:47 pm
Over Achievers Under Achievers - Teams
754B4E46554D4D466643544710220 wrote: Underachiever definition: one that fails to attain a predicted level of achievement or does not do as well as expected.
Overachiever definition: to perform better or achieve more than expected, especially by others.
Glad you defined them- might help Green Weenie to know the difference
Good one.....coming from a guy who needed to be told what division the Mets play in.
Overachiever definition: to perform better or achieve more than expected, especially by others.
Glad you defined them- might help Green Weenie to know the difference
Good one.....coming from a guy who needed to be told what division the Mets play in.
-
WildwoodDave2
Over Achievers Under Achievers - Teams
7144535358615353585F53360 wrote: Yeah. And, you're ready to censor my response.
You should be used to that by now.
You should be used to that by now.
-
Bobster21
Over Achievers Under Achievers - Teams
192C3B3B30093B3B30373B5E0 wrote: Yeah. And, you're ready to censor my response.
If you post the same message ad nauseum on numerous threads whether it's pertinent or not as you have done in the past, then yes it may get censored. And then you can complain again that you're not allowed to say anything negative when, in fact, you've repeated the same negative things so often in so many threads that it gets very annoying. Don't blame the mods if you don't know how to conduct yourself.
If you post the same message ad nauseum on numerous threads whether it's pertinent or not as you have done in the past, then yes it may get censored. And then you can complain again that you're not allowed to say anything negative when, in fact, you've repeated the same negative things so often in so many threads that it gets very annoying. Don't blame the mods if you don't know how to conduct yourself.
-
WildwoodDave2
Over Achievers Under Achievers - Teams
546176767D4476767D7A76130 wrote: Underachiever definition: one that fails to attain a predicted level of achievement or does not do as well as expected.
Overachiever definition: to perform better or achieve more than expected, especially by others.
Glad you defined them- might help Green Weenie to know the difference
Good one.....coming from a guy who needed to be told what division the Mets play in.
I am aware of what division they are in. They have just won a few in a row.- Shows how tight the division is.
Overachiever definition: to perform better or achieve more than expected, especially by others.
Glad you defined them- might help Green Weenie to know the difference
Good one.....coming from a guy who needed to be told what division the Mets play in.
I am aware of what division they are in. They have just won a few in a row.- Shows how tight the division is.
Over Achievers Under Achievers - Teams
113C31202736216162530 wrote: Yeah. And, you're ready to censor my response.
If you post the same message ad nauseum on numerous threads whether it's pertinent or not as you have done in the past, then yes it may get censored. And then you can complain again that you're not allowed to say anything negative when, in fact, you've repeated the same negative things so often in so many threads that it gets very annoying. Don't blame the mods if you don't know how to conduct yourself.
___________
Cancel culture???
If you post the same message ad nauseum on numerous threads whether it's pertinent or not as you have done in the past, then yes it may get censored. And then you can complain again that you're not allowed to say anything negative when, in fact, you've repeated the same negative things so often in so many threads that it gets very annoying. Don't blame the mods if you don't know how to conduct yourself.
___________
Cancel culture???
-
Bobster21
Over Achievers Under Achievers - Teams
29323F3E373B345A0 wrote: Yeah. And, you're ready to censor my response.
If you post the same message ad nauseum on numerous threads whether it's pertinent or not as you have done in the past, then yes it may get censored. And then you can complain again that you're not allowed to say anything negative when, in fact, you've repeated the same negative things so often in so many threads that it gets very annoying. Don't blame the mods if you don't know how to conduct yourself.
___________
Cancel culture???
Feel free to leave OBN if you're not happy.
If you post the same message ad nauseum on numerous threads whether it's pertinent or not as you have done in the past, then yes it may get censored. And then you can complain again that you're not allowed to say anything negative when, in fact, you've repeated the same negative things so often in so many threads that it gets very annoying. Don't blame the mods if you don't know how to conduct yourself.
___________
Cancel culture???
Feel free to leave OBN if you're not happy.
Over Achievers Under Achievers - Teams
153835242332256566570 wrote: Yeah. And, you're ready to censor my response.
If you post the same message ad nauseum on numerous threads whether it's pertinent or not as you have done in the past, then yes it may get censored. And then you can complain again that you're not allowed to say anything negative when, in fact, you've repeated the same negative things so often in so many threads that it gets very annoying. Don't blame the mods if you don't know how to conduct yourself.
___________
Cancel culture???
Feel free to leave OBN if you're not happy.
________
No thanks, I'll stay.
If you post the same message ad nauseum on numerous threads whether it's pertinent or not as you have done in the past, then yes it may get censored. And then you can complain again that you're not allowed to say anything negative when, in fact, you've repeated the same negative things so often in so many threads that it gets very annoying. Don't blame the mods if you don't know how to conduct yourself.
___________
Cancel culture???
Feel free to leave OBN if you're not happy.
________
No thanks, I'll stay.
-
GreenWeenie
- Posts: 4012
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2020 3:47 pm
Over Achievers Under Achievers - Teams
6D767B7A737F701E0 wrote: Yeah. And, you're ready to censor my response.
If you post the same message ad nauseum on numerous threads whether it's pertinent or not as you have done in the past, then yes it may get censored. And then you can complain again that you're not allowed to say anything negative when, in fact, you've repeated the same negative things so often in so many threads that it gets very annoying. Don't blame the mods if you don't know how to conduct yourself.
___________
Cancel culture???
Should we count the # of Repeated "Polanco" commentaries and who has made them?
I think it's more the case that there are disagreements of opinion more than anything else. People have different points of view. If a guy complains about some situations or players- but members AGREE, then we look the other way. But, if only a few hold that opion, then, it's how dare you?
I have a fellow member accuring me of having a serious disease, Let's let that go. If I wrote that about anyone else, there would be something to pay for it.
I've been accused of writing something like kicking the can. I don't think that I've written that in several weeks.
Jerry Meals is more consistent. (This is a JOKE, not a complaint. I think that some folks should lighten up a bit. Just an opinon, which I have no doubt, is in the minority.
If you post the same message ad nauseum on numerous threads whether it's pertinent or not as you have done in the past, then yes it may get censored. And then you can complain again that you're not allowed to say anything negative when, in fact, you've repeated the same negative things so often in so many threads that it gets very annoying. Don't blame the mods if you don't know how to conduct yourself.
___________
Cancel culture???
Should we count the # of Repeated "Polanco" commentaries and who has made them?
I think it's more the case that there are disagreements of opinion more than anything else. People have different points of view. If a guy complains about some situations or players- but members AGREE, then we look the other way. But, if only a few hold that opion, then, it's how dare you?
I have a fellow member accuring me of having a serious disease, Let's let that go. If I wrote that about anyone else, there would be something to pay for it.
I've been accused of writing something like kicking the can. I don't think that I've written that in several weeks.
Jerry Meals is more consistent. (This is a JOKE, not a complaint. I think that some folks should lighten up a bit. Just an opinon, which I have no doubt, is in the minority.