2024 Off-Season Thread

general

Moderators: SammyKhalifa, Doc, Bobster

Javy
Posts: 467
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2020 2:21 pm

Re: 2024 Off-Season Thread

Post by Javy »

fjk090852-7 wrote: Sat Jan 18, 2025 9:47 pm With the addition of Chase Shugart the roster sits at 41 players. Someone has to be removed soon. Maybe it is time to say goodbye to Williams?
I'd say it is well past time to say goodbye to Williams. But Ben seems to have the same affection for utility infielders as Huntington had. They keep bringing them home like stray puppies.
Ecbucs
Posts: 4381
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2016 9:53 pm

Re: 2024 Off-Season Thread

Post by Ecbucs »

Javy wrote: Sat Jan 18, 2025 10:15 pm
fjk090852-7 wrote: Sat Jan 18, 2025 9:47 pm With the addition of Chase Shugart the roster sits at 41 players. Someone has to be removed soon. Maybe it is time to say goodbye to Williams?
I'd say it is well past time to say goodbye to Williams. But Ben seems to have the same affection for utility infielders as Huntington had. They keep bringing them home like stray puppies.
Pirates first interview question to every GM candidate is:

How many utility infielders are enough? Best answer: You can never have enough utility infielders

How can we acquire utility infielders? Best answer: draft, international signings, trade, waivers, and free agency
Surgnbuck
Posts: 12165
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2020 6:42 pm

Re: 2024 Off-Season Thread

Post by Surgnbuck »

Reading from the Pirates Fest about the team wanting to embrace an "executing mentality." I was thinking, damn, there's a bunch of guys on this board who seem more than willing to execute some guys in the organization already.
Doc
Posts: 3571
Joined: Sun May 20, 2018 8:29 pm

Re: 2024 Off-Season Thread

Post by Doc »

There was an interview at yesterday’s Pirates Fest with McCutchen that appeared in today’s Post-Gazette. McCutchen, as one might expect, put the onus of winning on the players, dismissing any blame aimed at Nutting.

But there was something in the article that didn’t add up to that way of thinking. It was mentioned, according to Spotrac, that the projected payroll for 2025 is $64 million. While that’s deflating enough, later on the author of the article, Andrew Destin, stated that Nutting shouldn’t “be expected to afford Cherington the financial freedom to bring aboard top talent at any point in 2025”.

Shouldn’t be expected? Why not? BC could sign two $25 million players (the right ones, of course) and still be way, way under the league’s average payroll. Is winning the objective or not? It’s no wonder Nutting feels no pressure to try to improve when he has the media apologizing for him. Pathetic.
Ecbucs
Posts: 4381
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2016 9:53 pm

Re: 2024 Off-Season Thread

Post by Ecbucs »

Doc wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2025 3:42 pm There was an interview at yesterday’s Pirates Fest with McCutchen that appeared in today’s Post-Gazette. McCutchen, as one might expect, put the onus of winning on the players, dismissing any blame aimed at Nutting.

But there was something in the article that didn’t add up to that way of thinking. It was mentioned, according to Spotrac, that the projected payroll for 2025 is $64 million. While that’s deflating enough, later on the author of the article, Andrew Destin, stated that Nutting shouldn’t “be expected to afford Cherington the financial freedom to bring aboard top talent at any point in 2025”.

Shouldn’t be expected? Why not? BC could sign two $25 million players (the right ones, of course) and still be way, way under the league’s average payroll. Is winning the objective or not? It’s no wonder Nutting feels no pressure to try to improve when he has the media apologizing for him. Pathetic.
"We want to win as much as anyone."
Bobster
Posts: 1900
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2016 12:50 pm

Re: 2024 Off-Season Thread

Post by Bobster »

Ecbucs wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2025 9:32 pm
Doc wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2025 3:42 pm There was an interview at yesterday’s Pirates Fest with McCutchen that appeared in today’s Post-Gazette. McCutchen, as one might expect, put the onus of winning on the players, dismissing any blame aimed at Nutting.

But there was something in the article that didn’t add up to that way of thinking. It was mentioned, according to Spotrac, that the projected payroll for 2025 is $64 million. While that’s deflating enough, later on the author of the article, Andrew Destin, stated that Nutting shouldn’t “be expected to afford Cherington the financial freedom to bring aboard top talent at any point in 2025”.

Shouldn’t be expected? Why not? BC could sign two $25 million players (the right ones, of course) and still be way, way under the league’s average payroll. Is winning the objective or not? It’s no wonder Nutting feels no pressure to try to improve when he has the media apologizing for him. Pathetic.
"We want to win as much as anyone."
"We just aren't going to act on that desire." :D :D :D
There's no basement in the Alamo.
Surgnbuck
Posts: 12165
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2020 6:42 pm

Re: 2024 Off-Season Thread

Post by Surgnbuck »

This one even had Yankees fans screaming foul.
3pirates3
Posts: 1056
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2020 2:24 pm

Re: 2024 Off-Season Thread

Post by 3pirates3 »

Doc
Posts: 3571
Joined: Sun May 20, 2018 8:29 pm

Re: 2024 Off-Season Thread

Post by Doc »

We don't need Santander. Our guys just have to play better.
Post Reply