OnlyBucs

(For the Time Being) Oakland A's



Kansas Shitty Royals



The Small Market Chicago White Sox



The Free Spending But Destitute Pittsburgh Pre-Arbs

==================



What do these four clubs have in common that differs them from the other 26?

I am waiting for the answer GW. Or do you get a kick out of keeping us in the dark?

5B7A725B70781F0 wrote: I am waiting for the answer GW.  Or do you get a kick out of keeping us in the dark?   ;)


In 1998 (a long time ago) the Dodgers signed Kevin Brown to the first $100 million contract in MLB history.



These four clubs have yet to sign a player to a $100 million deal. The Guardians came off the list yesterday.

Within a couple years that list will be whittled down to just the A’s and the Pirates. The White Sox will surely lock up one or more of their young studs. KC will likely do the same with Whitt.

092C2F2F3A112C242631430 wrote: Within a couple years that list will be whittled down to just the A’s and the Pirates. The White Sox will surely lock up one or more of their young studs. KC will likely do the same with Whitt.


I doubt the Royals will sign Whitt, he is 33 yrs old and will not be a $100 mil player anytime soon.

Probably meant Bobby Witt, Jr.  21 years old.



The Pirates are the A's, WITH a stadium.



Probably a reason why they're dragging their feet getting one.

Thanks for the clairfication GW.