First, Sarris states this:
One answer is: all of them. Baseball is flush with record profits after selling off parts of MLBAM, and signing a new national television deal — enough so that they’re reportedly eyeing expansion — so that answer is good enough for many. And hard to argue with.
Next, he presents a chart showing the top teams who are projected to have winning seasons with the most money to spend based on past payroll levels:
These are good teams that have money to spend compared to what they’ve spent in the past. These are the top 5 with the additional money to spend listed:
Twins $36.7M
Indians $23.6M
Rays $20.6M
Pirates $19.5M
Astros $17.2M
Specifically regarding the Pirates Sarris writes:
The Pirates just traded a bunch of young players for Chris Archer and projected to be .500 in a division that suddenly looks attainable. Yes, the Cubs and Cardinals are projected to be six games better than the Bucs. But Chicago and St. Louis are both over their payrolls from last year, as well as their three-year averages. If the Pirates would be willing to go back to their three-year average, they could have as much as $30 million to spend.
If the Pirates spent that $30 million on, say, getting Manny Machado, they could jump right into the fray at the top of their division.
That’s the essence of a mystery team — a decent team, with money to spend, and a hole that could be filled by one of the best two free agents on the market, one of the youngest free agent superstars in years.
The Pirates could spend. They should spend. But will they?
Unfortunately, I think we all know the answer to that last question.
![Sad :(](./images/smilies/icon_e_sad.gif)