SOG/GOG
Moderators: SammyKhalifa, Doc, Bobster
SOG/GOG
507671646D61766068030 wrote: My vote for GOG goes to Cherington on 6/20.
The current count is:
Cherington - 2 (6/20)
Shelton - 2
You're the only one that voted for Cherington you dipstick.
_________
The Mods told you to stop but you go on trolling.
The current count is:
Cherington - 2 (6/20)
Shelton - 2
You're the only one that voted for Cherington you dipstick.
_________
The Mods told you to stop but you go on trolling.
SOG/GOG
6C3A2C38372D3D363B2C1E39333F3732703D5E0 wrote: My vote for GOG goes to Cherington on 6/20.
The current count is:
Cherington - 2 (6/20)
Shelton - 2
You're the only one that voted for Cherington you dipstick.
Kovie Math returns!
Don't bring the mods into it just because you can't count.
Shelton has 3 votes (me, Possum, Javy).
Cherington has 1 vote (shedman)
You have it 2-2. So you got them both wrong.
The current count is:
Cherington - 2 (6/20)
Shelton - 2
You're the only one that voted for Cherington you dipstick.
Kovie Math returns!
Don't bring the mods into it just because you can't count.
Shelton has 3 votes (me, Possum, Javy).
Cherington has 1 vote (shedman)
You have it 2-2. So you got them both wrong.
-
- Posts: 4012
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2020 3:47 pm
SOG/GOG
Ben deserves GOG. Can't live off Huntington's guys forever. Well, maybe he can. Even most of those aren't that good.
SOG/GOG
My vote for GOG goes to Cherington on 6/20.
The current count is:
Cherington - 2 (6/20)
Shelton - 3
The standings are:
SOG
Keller - 4
Andersen 3.5
A.Frazier - 3
Brubaker - 3
Stallings - 3
Polanco - 1.5
Perez - 1.5
bull pen -1
Moran - 1
Crowe - 1
Stokes - 1
Hayes - 1
Cahill - .5
GOG
Polanco 4 1/2
Cahill - 4
Keller - 4
Polanco - 4
Anderson 3 1/3
Kuhl - 3
Shelton - 3
Brubaker - 2 1/2
Crowe - 2
Underwood - 1.5
Feliz - 1
Oviedo - 1
Gonzalez - 1
T.Frazier - 1
Difo - 1
Newman - 1
Ponce - 1
Craig - 1
Rodriguez - 1
Hayes - 1
Holmes - 1
Bednar - 1
Huntington - 1/2
Fowler - 1/3
Tom - 1/2
Reynolds - 1/3
The current count is:
Cherington - 2 (6/20)
Shelton - 3
The standings are:
SOG
Keller - 4
Andersen 3.5
A.Frazier - 3
Brubaker - 3
Stallings - 3
Polanco - 1.5
Perez - 1.5
bull pen -1
Moran - 1
Crowe - 1
Stokes - 1
Hayes - 1
Cahill - .5
GOG
Polanco 4 1/2
Cahill - 4
Keller - 4
Polanco - 4
Anderson 3 1/3
Kuhl - 3
Shelton - 3
Brubaker - 2 1/2
Crowe - 2
Underwood - 1.5
Feliz - 1
Oviedo - 1
Gonzalez - 1
T.Frazier - 1
Difo - 1
Newman - 1
Ponce - 1
Craig - 1
Rodriguez - 1
Hayes - 1
Holmes - 1
Bednar - 1
Huntington - 1/2
Fowler - 1/3
Tom - 1/2
Reynolds - 1/3
SOG/GOG
If the GM is the GOG for assembling the personnel on the roster that lost the game rather than the manager for how he handled the roster for that particular game or any player for what they did in that particular game, then how can any loss be the fault of anyone except the GM? Why not just have a SOG for wins and stipulate that any loss is the fault of the GM regardless of what anyone else does?
-
- Posts: 4012
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2020 3:47 pm
SOG/GOG
The manager's here because he was hired by the GM.
SOG/GOG
113C31202736216162530 wrote: If the GM is the GOG for assembling the personnel on the roster that lost the game rather than the manager for how he handled the roster for that particular game or any player for what they did in that particular game, then how can any loss be the fault of anyone except the GM? Why not just have a SOG for wins and stipulate that any loss is the fault of the GM regardless of what anyone else does?
You've just made Shed's head explode. He's right this minute kicking himself for having not thought of that.
You've just made Shed's head explode. He's right this minute kicking himself for having not thought of that.
SOG/GOG
0A272A3B3C2D3A7A79480 wrote: If the GM is the GOG for assembling the personnel on the roster that lost the game rather than the manager for how he handled the roster for that particular game or any player for what they did in that particular game, then how can any loss be the fault of anyone except the GM? Why not just have a SOG for wins and stipulate that any loss is the fault of the GM regardless of what anyone else does?
______
If I eliminated the GOG, you wouldn't be able to vote for Shelton after every game.
______
If I eliminated the GOG, you wouldn't be able to vote for Shelton after every game.
SOG/GOG
647F72737A7679170 wrote: If the GM is the GOG for assembling the personnel on the roster that lost the game rather than the manager for how he handled the roster for that particular game or any player for what they did in that particular game, then how can any loss be the fault of anyone except the GM? Why not just have a SOG for wins and stipulate that any loss is the fault of the GM regardless of what anyone else does?
______
If I eliminated the GOG, you wouldn't be able to vote for Shelton after every game.
I don't. I vote for him when he screws up and costs them the game. When a player screws up and costs them the game, I vote for the player. But I guess i can't expect someone to understand that who can't even count 2 votes correctly.
______
If I eliminated the GOG, you wouldn't be able to vote for Shelton after every game.
I don't. I vote for him when he screws up and costs them the game. When a player screws up and costs them the game, I vote for the player. But I guess i can't expect someone to understand that who can't even count 2 votes correctly.
-
- Posts: 4012
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2020 3:47 pm
SOG/GOG
With banter such as this on a daily basis, all i have to say is this:
If our baseball team was as good as our message board, we wouldn't need to count any GOG votes. Even Ben and Shelty couldn't screw it up!
On second thought, Ben could. He'd probably dump all of us for LMG posters who may or may never see the light of day on a MLB message board.
If our baseball team was as good as our message board, we wouldn't need to count any GOG votes. Even Ben and Shelty couldn't screw it up!
On second thought, Ben could. He'd probably dump all of us for LMG posters who may or may never see the light of day on a MLB message board.