616860717F050 wrote: What doesn't make sense to me is that if they had a player in mind who was on the 40, they could have done it then, before August 1st.
They almost had to have a list of guys.
Very likely and TB wants to take a longer look at each. Also, sometimes the pick is conditional. For example if Archer achieves certain performance levels the pick could be better. But I don't know if that's the case here.
8/9/ late game vs SF
Moderators: SammyKhalifa, Doc, Bobster
-
skinnyhorse
- Posts: 926
- Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2016 1:19 am
8/9/ late game vs SF
5E737E6F68796E2E2D1C0 wrote: What doesn't make sense to me is that if they had a player in mind who was on the 40, they could have done it then, before August 1st.
They almost had to have a list of guys.
Very likely and TB wants to take a longer look at each. Also, sometimes the pick is conditional. For example if Archer achieves certain performance levels the pick could be better. But I don't know if that's the case here.
Any GM worth his salt would make it conditional on Archer's performance.
They almost had to have a list of guys.
Very likely and TB wants to take a longer look at each. Also, sometimes the pick is conditional. For example if Archer achieves certain performance levels the pick could be better. But I don't know if that's the case here.
Any GM worth his salt would make it conditional on Archer's performance.