OnlyBucs

Actually, I can't back that up. But you should accept no goat votes. At the very least you should set down parameters. You can't make shit up as you go along. It's dishonest, much like the way you play golf.

49525F5E575B543A0 wrote: My vote for SOG goes to Stallings for 5/15 vs Giants



The current count is:



Stallings - 3



The standings are:



SOG

Andersen 3.5

Keller - 3

Brubaker - 2

A.Frazier - 2

Stallings - 2

bullpen -1

Moran - 1

Crowe - 1

Stokes - 1

Polanco - .5

Cahill - .5

Perez - .5



GOG

Cahill - 3

Polanco - 3

Keller - 3

Andersen - 1 1/3

Feliz - 1

Kuhl - 1

Oviedo - 1

Shelton - 1

Gonzalez - 1

T.Frazier - 1

Difo - 1

Crowe - 1

Underwood - 1

Brubaker - 1/2

Huntington - 1/2

Fowler - 1/3

Underwood - 1/2

Tom - 1/2

Reynolds - 1/3


I have revised the standings showing A. Frazier's Friday nite SOG win and Stallings for Saturday night's SOG.

From here on you will count any no goat votes and refrain from voting for and/or counting and votes for anyone other than on the field personnel for GOG.  In addition, you will finalize who the SOG or GOG is by listing the date of the game and the opponent.

GOG

Newman 1/3

Reynolds 1/3

Stokes Jr. 1/3

Among them, they left 11 runners on base without any of the runners scoring.

Newman. He was the main cog of blah.

311710050C00170109620 wrote: Newman. He was the main cog of blah.
I will go along with Newman

Bednar. He put a 2-1 game in the 9th out of reach.

795F584D44485F49412A0 wrote: Actually, I can't back that up. But you should accept no goat votes. At the very least you should set down parameters. You can't make shit up as you go along. It's dishonest, much like the way you play golf.
______

As I recall. the last time we played golf, I whipped you pretty soundly.

5E787F6A636F786E660D0 wrote: Actually, I can't back that up. But you should accept no goat votes. At the very least you should set down parameters. You can't make shit up as you go along. It's dishonest, much like the way you play golf.
_______

There will be no "No Goat" votes unless you want to take over the thread. Then you can do whatever you like.

524944454C404F210 wrote: Actually, I can't back that up. But you should accept no goat votes. At the very least you should set down parameters. You can't make shit up as you go along. It's dishonest, much like the way you play golf.
______

As I recall. the last time we played golf, I whipped you pretty soundly.


Last time we played, I could barely walk. At least I played my own ball.

213A37363F333C520 wrote: Actually, I can't back that up. But you should accept no goat votes. At the very least you should set down parameters. You can't make shit up as you go along. It's dishonest, much like the way you play golf.
_______

There will be no "No Goat" votes unless you want to take over the thread.  Then  you can do whatever you like. 
Besides you being a bit of a b*tch about this, how do you justify not allowing no goat votes when that was always the standard. How do you justify allowing votes for Huntington.



Man up already.