Tanking
Moderators: SammyKhalifa, Doc, Bobster
Tanking
Quite honestly, I think the Pirates would be hard-pressed to finish above .500 in the AA Eastern League, and I’m absolutely serious about that. This team is absolutely dreadful, like beyond bad. It’s actually been kind of nice...I haven’t watched a game or read a game thread in about two weeks. I haven’t spent one dime on MLB this year and don’t intend to. In fact, I think out of generosity and compassion for the Cards situation, they should forfeit the remaining games they have with St. Louis this year.
-
Bobster21
Tanking
362E2C2B2B3C2D2A373620450 wrote: I don't get what anyone sees in Mustgroove. I just don't.
Great guy. Maybe an adequate player.
We need more than clubhouse guys or whatever.
I agree. He's very inconsistent. He can pitch a great game and then stink his next outing. Or he can look dominant for a few inning and then get rocked for an early exit. The Astros removed him from the rotation where he did poorly and put him in the BP where he did great. Of course the Pirates' mentality of thinking they are smarter than everyone else saw a failed starter and decided he could anchor their staff.
His stuff seems to play well for a few innings of each game or throughout a game every once in a while. In other words, you never know if you can count on him. He could probably be their best reliever but they are so starved for starting pitchers that even with his inconsistency they have no one better.
Does this remind you of anything, really good stuff, but inconsistent, Glasnow, Cole maybe. The thing I like about him is he's a competitor much like Cole you can't put a value on that. It was obvious Cole wanted out, because it became apparent the Pirates were going no where and he was wasting his time. This can become a problem with the entire team unless improvements start happening soon. I'm not sure the manager and front office understand this. They must get buy in from the players and unless they get things turned around soon it's going to metastasis. I don't get any feeling that they are interested in winning right now, that has to change or we're in for another record losing streak. Players are emotional and right now it looks like everyone is just going through the motions. That falls on the manager.
Yeah, I can see the similarities somewhat. Although I don't think Musgrove has the "stuff" that Cole and Glasnow have. But he's a competitor. And in that vein, part of his game was that he could handle the bat and run the bases. But now he sits and watches DHs. Pre DH, Brault and Musgrove gave the Bucs a slight edge because they added more offense than the opposing pitcher. But Pirate hitting is so bad that they now face the disadvantage of every opponent having a better DH.
Both Cole and Morton failed to reach their potential until they got to the Astros. I don't know about Morton but Cole credited the Astros with changing his approach and making him a better pitcher. But these are the same Astros who removed the struggling Musgrove from their rotation and put him in the BP where he excelled. If the Astros are really that good at getting the most out of pitchers, it doesn't say much for Musgrove that the Astros found him better suited for the BP.
Great guy. Maybe an adequate player.
We need more than clubhouse guys or whatever.
I agree. He's very inconsistent. He can pitch a great game and then stink his next outing. Or he can look dominant for a few inning and then get rocked for an early exit. The Astros removed him from the rotation where he did poorly and put him in the BP where he did great. Of course the Pirates' mentality of thinking they are smarter than everyone else saw a failed starter and decided he could anchor their staff.
His stuff seems to play well for a few innings of each game or throughout a game every once in a while. In other words, you never know if you can count on him. He could probably be their best reliever but they are so starved for starting pitchers that even with his inconsistency they have no one better.
Does this remind you of anything, really good stuff, but inconsistent, Glasnow, Cole maybe. The thing I like about him is he's a competitor much like Cole you can't put a value on that. It was obvious Cole wanted out, because it became apparent the Pirates were going no where and he was wasting his time. This can become a problem with the entire team unless improvements start happening soon. I'm not sure the manager and front office understand this. They must get buy in from the players and unless they get things turned around soon it's going to metastasis. I don't get any feeling that they are interested in winning right now, that has to change or we're in for another record losing streak. Players are emotional and right now it looks like everyone is just going through the motions. That falls on the manager.
Yeah, I can see the similarities somewhat. Although I don't think Musgrove has the "stuff" that Cole and Glasnow have. But he's a competitor. And in that vein, part of his game was that he could handle the bat and run the bases. But now he sits and watches DHs. Pre DH, Brault and Musgrove gave the Bucs a slight edge because they added more offense than the opposing pitcher. But Pirate hitting is so bad that they now face the disadvantage of every opponent having a better DH.
Both Cole and Morton failed to reach their potential until they got to the Astros. I don't know about Morton but Cole credited the Astros with changing his approach and making him a better pitcher. But these are the same Astros who removed the struggling Musgrove from their rotation and put him in the BP where he excelled. If the Astros are really that good at getting the most out of pitchers, it doesn't say much for Musgrove that the Astros found him better suited for the BP.
Tanking
IMO, Musgrove is an ideal #5 starter. He can be lights out, or putrid. I'd rather have that than consistent mediocrity. Problem is, we have him pegged as our #1. I like Musgrove and actually think he can be part of a good team in Pittsburgh, but at the back of the rotation...not the front.
-
GreenWeenie
- Posts: 4012
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2020 3:47 pm
Tanking
7045525259605252595E52370 wrote: Is there any of last season's LCS clubs that would trade one of their pitchers for him?
Probably not.
And, Cole won 19 games in a year for us, as a reminder.
I expect 22, 23-year-olds to have consistency challenges. Not sure that I expect guys of Mustgroove's age to as often. He should be cruising by now.
Probably not.
And, Cole won 19 games in a year for us, as a reminder.
I expect 22, 23-year-olds to have consistency challenges. Not sure that I expect guys of Mustgroove's age to as often. He should be cruising by now.
-
WildwoodDave
- Posts: 568
- Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2020 11:19 am
Tanking
626A695E486D4A452B0 wrote: IMO, Musgrove is an ideal #5 starter. He can be lights out, or putrid. I'd rather have that than consistent mediocrity. Problem is, we have him pegged as our #1. I like Musgrove and actually think he can be part of a good team in Pittsburgh, but at the back of the rotation...not the front.
By the time Pittsburgh has a good team, Musgrove will be long gone or retired
By the time Pittsburgh has a good team, Musgrove will be long gone or retired
-
GreenWeenie
- Posts: 4012
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2020 3:47 pm
Tanking
That's the problem.
The reason the team's no good is.....because of who's on it.
The BIG problem is- Mustgroove could be among the better on a bad bunch. He's one of the taller midgets in the circus.
Since he's still a midget, we arent going to win many basketball games.
The reason the team's no good is.....because of who's on it.
The BIG problem is- Mustgroove could be among the better on a bad bunch. He's one of the taller midgets in the circus.
Since he's still a midget, we arent going to win many basketball games.
-
Bobster21
Tanking
437661616A5361616A6D61040 wrote: That's the problem.
The reason the team's no good is.....because of who's on it.
The BIG problem is- Mustgroove could be among the better on a bad bunch. He's one of the taller midgets in the circus.
Since he's still a midget, we arent going to win many basketball games.
The Pirates don't acquire established, productive players because they come with big contracts. So they get players like Musgrove in hopes that in a year or 2 they will become productive. Maybe he'll eventually become consistent. But he's a FA in 3 years. So at best they have 2 more years with him during which he's still trying to figure things out. But in reality they will trade him prior to or during the 2022 season to at least get something for him before he walks.
The reason the team's no good is.....because of who's on it.
The BIG problem is- Mustgroove could be among the better on a bad bunch. He's one of the taller midgets in the circus.
Since he's still a midget, we arent going to win many basketball games.
The Pirates don't acquire established, productive players because they come with big contracts. So they get players like Musgrove in hopes that in a year or 2 they will become productive. Maybe he'll eventually become consistent. But he's a FA in 3 years. So at best they have 2 more years with him during which he's still trying to figure things out. But in reality they will trade him prior to or during the 2022 season to at least get something for him before he walks.
-
maher.timothy20@gm
Tanking
5204120609130308051220070D01090C4E03600 wrote: Tanking for a draft pick seems like an incredibly stupid approach.
Draft picks, even No. 1 draft picks, are a coin flip. What's worse, they're a coin flip where you don't know the result for four or five years.
I don't know what the hell they're doing. I'd say they're "rebuilding" but if that were the case [highlight]they'd have a boatload of talent in the minors ready to take over in the next year or two.[/highlight]
That falls on Huntington, which has also helped cripple BC's ability to make changes. He has no one to replace the lack of talent in Pittsburgh. He has no one to trade to acquire young talent. He has the worst team, maybe the worst organization, in baseball, with no help coming from the owner. It's going to be three years before we see progress here, and that's if BC has a 1974 Steelers-like influx of talent.
To say he has no one to trade isn't quite accurate. I think Bell would have been attractive to a lot of teams this offseason. Frazier, maybe. Possibly Trevor Williams.
I mean, if you're going to rebuild, then rebuild, or try to, at least. My issue with this year is they decided to take a year and do nothing. Which does not bode well for their plans for upcoming years.
Draft picks, even No. 1 draft picks, are a coin flip. What's worse, they're a coin flip where you don't know the result for four or five years.
I don't know what the hell they're doing. I'd say they're "rebuilding" but if that were the case [highlight]they'd have a boatload of talent in the minors ready to take over in the next year or two.[/highlight]
That falls on Huntington, which has also helped cripple BC's ability to make changes. He has no one to replace the lack of talent in Pittsburgh. He has no one to trade to acquire young talent. He has the worst team, maybe the worst organization, in baseball, with no help coming from the owner. It's going to be three years before we see progress here, and that's if BC has a 1974 Steelers-like influx of talent.
To say he has no one to trade isn't quite accurate. I think Bell would have been attractive to a lot of teams this offseason. Frazier, maybe. Possibly Trevor Williams.
I mean, if you're going to rebuild, then rebuild, or try to, at least. My issue with this year is they decided to take a year and do nothing. Which does not bode well for their plans for upcoming years.
-
2drfischer@gmail.c
Tanking
48444D40570B514C484A514D5C1715654248250 wrote: Tanking for a draft pick seems like an incredibly stupid approach.
Draft picks, even No. 1 draft picks, are a coin flip. What's worse, they're a coin flip where you don't know the result for four or five years.
I don't know what the hell they're doing. I'd say they're "rebuilding" but if that were the case [highlight]they'd have a boatload of talent in the minors ready to take over in the next year or two.[/highlight]
That falls on Huntington, which has also helped cripple BC's ability to make changes. He has no one to replace the lack of talent in Pittsburgh. He has no one to trade to acquire young talent. He has the worst team, maybe the worst organization, in baseball, with no help coming from the owner. It's going to be three years before we see progress here, and that's if BC has a 1974 Steelers-like influx of talent.
To say he has no one to trade isn't quite accurate. I think Bell would have been attractive to a lot of teams this offseason. Frazier, maybe. Possibly Trevor Williams.
I mean, if you're going to rebuild, then rebuild, or try to, at least. My issue with this year is they decided to take a year and do nothing. Which does not bode well for their plans for upcoming years.
I'm not as sure about Bell returning much. He had a couple of good months last year and then was less than average. In addition, he's attractive to only half of the major league clubs because his defense is suspect at best. And if he is good, why trade him at all? He's young and the team's best hitter. He's the kind of player BC would be trying to get back in a trade.
I also don't think Frazier would return much. He'd be a nice player on a team that would surround him with better players. I like him, but he wouldn't replace many other 2Bmen around baseball.
Travis Williams might bring something decent back, but he's the team's best pitcher, which isn't saying much. But he wouldn't be any other teams' best pitcher, so I don't suspect he'd return much in a trade, either. Besides, as we've seen from the starting pitching this year, the team is going to need him as it tries to get better over the next few years.
If they've decided to take this year to "do nothing", why would you expect them to continue to do nothing next year? The Player's Union, not to mention the fans, would have none of it. Nutting would come under intense pressure from the Union and the fans, who have already been showing signs of being fed up with him, would stay away in droves.
I guess I should ask, what you mean by "doing nothing"? What do you think BC's plan was, or has been, for this year?
I agree with your statement about rebuilding. With a new Front Office and manager, the fans would be on board with starting over and would likely be in full support.
Draft picks, even No. 1 draft picks, are a coin flip. What's worse, they're a coin flip where you don't know the result for four or five years.
I don't know what the hell they're doing. I'd say they're "rebuilding" but if that were the case [highlight]they'd have a boatload of talent in the minors ready to take over in the next year or two.[/highlight]
That falls on Huntington, which has also helped cripple BC's ability to make changes. He has no one to replace the lack of talent in Pittsburgh. He has no one to trade to acquire young talent. He has the worst team, maybe the worst organization, in baseball, with no help coming from the owner. It's going to be three years before we see progress here, and that's if BC has a 1974 Steelers-like influx of talent.
To say he has no one to trade isn't quite accurate. I think Bell would have been attractive to a lot of teams this offseason. Frazier, maybe. Possibly Trevor Williams.
I mean, if you're going to rebuild, then rebuild, or try to, at least. My issue with this year is they decided to take a year and do nothing. Which does not bode well for their plans for upcoming years.
I'm not as sure about Bell returning much. He had a couple of good months last year and then was less than average. In addition, he's attractive to only half of the major league clubs because his defense is suspect at best. And if he is good, why trade him at all? He's young and the team's best hitter. He's the kind of player BC would be trying to get back in a trade.
I also don't think Frazier would return much. He'd be a nice player on a team that would surround him with better players. I like him, but he wouldn't replace many other 2Bmen around baseball.
Travis Williams might bring something decent back, but he's the team's best pitcher, which isn't saying much. But he wouldn't be any other teams' best pitcher, so I don't suspect he'd return much in a trade, either. Besides, as we've seen from the starting pitching this year, the team is going to need him as it tries to get better over the next few years.
If they've decided to take this year to "do nothing", why would you expect them to continue to do nothing next year? The Player's Union, not to mention the fans, would have none of it. Nutting would come under intense pressure from the Union and the fans, who have already been showing signs of being fed up with him, would stay away in droves.
I guess I should ask, what you mean by "doing nothing"? What do you think BC's plan was, or has been, for this year?
I agree with your statement about rebuilding. With a new Front Office and manager, the fans would be on board with starting over and would likely be in full support.
-
DemDog
Tanking
2D7B6D79766C7C777A6D5F78727E7673317C1F0 wrote: Tanking for a draft pick seems like an incredibly stupid approach.
Draft picks, even No. 1 draft picks, are a coin flip. What's worse, they're a coin flip where you don't know the result for four or five years.
I don't know what the hell they're doing. I'd say they're "rebuilding" but if that were the case [highlight]they'd have a boatload of talent in the minors ready to take over in the next year or two.[/highlight]
That falls on Huntington, which has also helped cripple BC's ability to make changes. He has no one to replace the lack of talent in Pittsburgh. He has no one to trade to acquire young talent. He has the worst team, maybe the worst organization, in baseball, with no help coming from the owner. It's going to be three years before we see progress here, and that's if BC has a 1974 Steelers-like influx of talent.
To say he has no one to trade isn't quite accurate. I think Bell would have been attractive to a lot of teams this offseason. Frazier, maybe. Possibly Trevor Williams.
I mean, if you're going to rebuild, then rebuild, or try to, at least. My issue with this year is they decided to take a year and do nothing. Which does not bode well for their plans for upcoming years.
I'm not as sure about Bell returning much. He had a couple of good months last year and then was less than average. In addition, he's attractive to only half of the major league clubs because his defense is suspect at best. And if he is good, why trade him at all? He's young and the team's best hitter. He's the kind of player BC would be trying to get back in a trade.
I also don't think Frazier would return much. He'd be a nice player on a team that would surround him with better players. I like him, but he wouldn't replace many other 2Bmen around baseball.
[highlight]Travis Williams might bring something decent back[/highlight], but he's the team's best pitcher, which isn't saying much. But he wouldn't be any other teams' best pitcher, so I don't suspect he'd return much in a trade, either. Besides, as we've seen from the starting pitching this year, the team is going to need him as it tries to get better over the next few years.
If they've decided to take this year to "do nothing", why would you expect them to continue to do nothing next year? The Player's Union, not to mention the fans, would have none of it. Nutting would come under intense pressure from the Union and the fans, who have already been showing signs of being fed up with him, would stay away in droves.
I guess I should ask, what you mean by "doing nothing"? What do you think BC's plan was, or has been, for this year?
I agree with your statement about rebuilding. With a new Front Office and manager, the fans would be on board with starting over and would likely be in full support.
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
Draft picks, even No. 1 draft picks, are a coin flip. What's worse, they're a coin flip where you don't know the result for four or five years.
I don't know what the hell they're doing. I'd say they're "rebuilding" but if that were the case [highlight]they'd have a boatload of talent in the minors ready to take over in the next year or two.[/highlight]
That falls on Huntington, which has also helped cripple BC's ability to make changes. He has no one to replace the lack of talent in Pittsburgh. He has no one to trade to acquire young talent. He has the worst team, maybe the worst organization, in baseball, with no help coming from the owner. It's going to be three years before we see progress here, and that's if BC has a 1974 Steelers-like influx of talent.
To say he has no one to trade isn't quite accurate. I think Bell would have been attractive to a lot of teams this offseason. Frazier, maybe. Possibly Trevor Williams.
I mean, if you're going to rebuild, then rebuild, or try to, at least. My issue with this year is they decided to take a year and do nothing. Which does not bode well for their plans for upcoming years.
I'm not as sure about Bell returning much. He had a couple of good months last year and then was less than average. In addition, he's attractive to only half of the major league clubs because his defense is suspect at best. And if he is good, why trade him at all? He's young and the team's best hitter. He's the kind of player BC would be trying to get back in a trade.
I also don't think Frazier would return much. He'd be a nice player on a team that would surround him with better players. I like him, but he wouldn't replace many other 2Bmen around baseball.
[highlight]Travis Williams might bring something decent back[/highlight], but he's the team's best pitcher, which isn't saying much. But he wouldn't be any other teams' best pitcher, so I don't suspect he'd return much in a trade, either. Besides, as we've seen from the starting pitching this year, the team is going to need him as it tries to get better over the next few years.
If they've decided to take this year to "do nothing", why would you expect them to continue to do nothing next year? The Player's Union, not to mention the fans, would have none of it. Nutting would come under intense pressure from the Union and the fans, who have already been showing signs of being fed up with him, would stay away in droves.
I guess I should ask, what you mean by "doing nothing"? What do you think BC's plan was, or has been, for this year?
I agree with your statement about rebuilding. With a new Front Office and manager, the fans would be on board with starting over and would likely be in full support.
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D