Page 2 of 2
ONE EXPLANATION
Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2016 1:56 am
by dogknot17@yahoo.co
Your post is exactly my point.
They are in the same position and yet people think they have no shot. I will stay positive. Like I did in 2014.
ONE EXPLANATION
Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2016 2:27 am
by Bobster21
757E767A7F7E652026516870797E7E3F727E110 wrote: Your post is exactly my point.
They are in the same position and yet people think they have no shot. I will stay positive. Like I did in 2014.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KX5jNnDMfxA
ONE EXPLANATION
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 3:47 am
by BucAndEer
624F42535445521211200 wrote: Exactly the same record as in 2014.
We shouldn't be giving up. Let's go. We can do this.
Yes but...the Pirates need to go 24-13 the rest of the way to equal the 2014 record of 88-74. That's almost 2 wins for each loss which is far different than the 1:1 ratio we've seen so far. Furthermore, SF needs only go 20-15 to win 89 games and St.L needs go only 22-14 to win 89 games. So even if they could match 2014's record, it might not be good enough.
Exactly. That 9-22 collapse by the Brewers in 2014 certainly helped the situation. Doesn't look like the Cubs have that kind of meltdown in them, and the Cardinals have their devil magic working again so it looks like the Pirates are going to need the Giants to go belly up -- a tall order in an even year.
ONE EXPLANATION
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 1:49 pm
by UtahPirate
0F382E0C232908283F4D0 wrote: Exactly the same record as in 2014.
We shouldn't be giving up. Let's go. We can do this.
Yes but...the Pirates need to go 24-13 the rest of the way to equal the 2014 record of 88-74. That's almost 2 wins for each loss which is far different than the 1:1 ratio we've seen so far. Furthermore, SF needs only go 20-15 to win 89 games and St.L needs go only 22-14 to win 89 games. So even if they could match 2014's record, it might not be good enough.
Exactly. That 9-22 collapse by the Brewers in 2014 certainly helped the situation. Doesn't look like the Cubs have that kind of meltdown in them, and the Cardinals have their devil magic working again so it looks like the Pirates are going to need the Giants to go belly up -- a tall order in an even year.
And his name is Jed Gyorko. Ten HRs in August, and the most in the majors since the All Star break (I think). Freaking Jed Gyorko. How does that happen. I agree, it's devil magic. The only explanation.
ONE EXPLANATION
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 2:10 pm
by Ecbucs
1637222B132A31223726430 wrote: Exactly the same record as in 2014.
We shouldn't be giving up. Let's go. We can do this.
Yes but...the Pirates need to go 24-13 the rest of the way to equal the 2014 record of 88-74. That's almost 2 wins for each loss which is far different than the 1:1 ratio we've seen so far. Furthermore, SF needs only go 20-15 to win 89 games and St.L needs go only 22-14 to win 89 games. So even if they could match 2014's record, it might not be good enough.
Exactly. That 9-22 collapse by the Brewers in 2014 certainly helped the situation. Doesn't look like the Cubs have that kind of meltdown in them, and the Cardinals have their devil magic working again so it looks like the Pirates are going to need the Giants to go belly up -- a tall order in an even year.
And his name is Jed Gyorko. Ten HRs in August, and the most in the majors since the All Star break (I think). Freaking Jed Gyorko. How does that happen. I agree, it's devil magic. The only explanation.
He was on my fantasy team until mid-July. If I wouldn't have cut him he might have hit one homer in that time frame.
ONE EXPLANATION
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 3:14 pm
by SammyKhalifa
6D4B4A5D4B5B280 wrote:
He was on my fantasy team until mid-July. If I wouldn't have cut him he might have hit one homer in that time frame.
Well I think we all know what needs to be done . . .
ONE EXPLANATION
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 5:55 pm
by Ecbucs
073539392D1F3C35383D3235540 wrote:
He was on my fantasy team until mid-July. If I wouldn't have cut him he might have hit one homer in that time frame.
Well I think we all know what needs to be done . . .
I am picking up every available Cub, Giant and Cardinal that I can.
ONE EXPLANATION
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 6:03 pm
by zeitgeist
694B58454643444B685F4949452A0 wrote: If you made me pick just one stat or one note that best explained why the Pirates are not currently in playoff position, I would choose this one:
Pirates’ record last year in games started by Cole: 23-9
Pirates’ record this year in games started by Cole: 8-12
That is an enormous swing.
Let’s give him a (very big) benefit of the doubt and say that the Pirates will win 2 more of his starts, which seems hard to believe at this point. But, anyway, that would make 10 for the year.
That’s a huge 13-game drop-off. And to me that provides the single biggest explanation for why this team is currently out of playoff position.
If the Pirates had gone just 13-7 in his starts this year (instead of 8-12), they would lead the wild card standings.
That certainly is a factor but I do not think there is a bigger factor than Andrew McCutchen with an OPS + of 97 at the end of August. Cutch plays every day. He has been the biggest difference maker this year and I don't really think it is that close. I would rank Liriano 2nd and Cole 3rd...