Page 2 of 6

Kang

Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 3:42 am
by dave3BA
Wow.

Kang

Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 2:29 pm
by dogknot17@yahoo.co
I don't think there are suspensions for DUI in MLB.



Before Huntington, many players got in trouble after games. The Pirates used to provide alcohol in the clubhouse and many players got a DUI leaving the ballpark. I can name a few for sure.



Kang should know better. One or two drinks can put you over the limit now. That is scary for all.

Kang

Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 2:32 pm
by SammyKhalifa
2328202C2928337670073E262F2828692428470 wrote: I don't think there are suspensions for DUI in MLB.



Before Huntington, many players got in trouble after games.  The Pirates used to provide alcohol in the clubhouse and many players got a DUI leaving the ballpark.  I can name a few for sure. 



Kang should know better.  One or two drinks can put you over the limit now.  That is scary for all.


The issue for me is that this isn't an isolated matter for him now. I was giving benefit of the doubt after the Chicago Incident (feels like it deserves capital letters) but he's building a track record here.

Kang

Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 2:49 pm
by SammyKhalifa
Here are some more details:



http://english.yonhapnews.co.kr/culture ... witter.com



My main takeaway from this article is that cars in Korea have a "Black Box" that tells police who was driving the car.

Kang

Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 2:58 pm
by dogknot17@yahoo.co
695B57574371525B56535C5B3A0 wrote: I don't think there are suspensions for DUI in MLB.



Before Huntington, many players got in trouble after games.  The Pirates used to provide alcohol in the clubhouse and many players got a DUI leaving the ballpark.  I can name a few for sure. 



Kang should know better.  One or two drinks can put you over the limit now.  That is scary for all.


The issue for me is that this isn't an isolated matter for him now.  I was giving benefit of the doubt after the Chicago Incident (feels like it deserves capital letters) but he's building a track record here. 




Even if he is innocent in his first run-in with the law?

Kang

Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 3:04 pm
by SammyKhalifa
I'm not working in a court of law here.  I'm just forming an opinion of the guy not sending him to prison. How many stories (proven or unproven) should there be before you'd start to wonder if there is something to it?  I understand wait-and-see, but to me (language barrier or not) there's a picture of this guy coming into focus that I'm not too sure that I like. 

Kang

Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 3:32 pm
by BenM
Dashcam footage from Korean news.







He's lucky he smashed into the divider. It was the only thing keeping him from plowing into the oncoming traffic.

Kang

Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 3:53 pm
by dogknot17@yahoo.co
Yes he is. That is really bad. Way too fast around that bend. Many people are lucky for that guard rail. Wow.

Kang

Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 4:46 pm
by Ecbucs
he is most likely on the trading block now.

Kang

Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:08 pm
by RichD
Wonder why he has a dash cam on his vehicle. Are those options now a day?