Nicassio and LeBlanc placed on Irrevoccable Waivers

fjk090852-7 · Post by **fjk090852-7** » Wed Aug 30, 2017 12:00 am

There is a report that the Bucs put both players on irrevocable waivers. I think both can be claimed by another team and the Bucs cannot pull them back.

Bobster21 · Post by **Bobster21** » Wed Aug 30, 2017 12:05 am

343839626B626A67607F65520 wrote: There is a report that the Bucs put both players on irrevocable waivers. I think both can be claimed by another team and the Bucs cannot pull them back.
Doesn't make sense that they would simply waive Nicasio and get no return.

Bobster21 · Post by **Bobster21** » Wed Aug 30, 2017 12:07 am

646869323B323A37302F35020 wrote: There is a report that the Bucs put both players on irrevocable waivers. I think both can be claimed by another team and the Bucs cannot pull them back.
Holy Wes Chamberlain, Batman!

SCBucco · Post by **SCBucco** » Wed Aug 30, 2017 12:43 am

567B76676071662625140 wrote: There is a report that the Bucs put both players on irrevocable waivers. I think both can be claimed by another team and the Bucs cannot pull them back.
Doesn't make sense that they would simply waive Nicasio and get no return.

He has been placed on outright waivers according to this ... if so, this is a joke. Could have gotten something for him earlier. Now, they could get nothing only to save 600K. This organization simply amazes me - not in a good way. Big fail by NH.

https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2017/08/ ... ivers.html

Modified to correct link above.

Bobster21 · Post by **Bobster21** » Wed Aug 30, 2017 1:02 am

7F6F6E594F4F432C0 wrote: There is a report that the Bucs put both players on irrevocable waivers. I think both can be claimed by another team and the Bucs cannot pull them back.
Doesn't make sense that they would simply waive Nicasio and get no return.

He has been placed on outright waivers according to this ... if so, this is a joke. Could have gotten something for him earlier. Now, they could get nothing only to save 600K. This organization simply amazes me - not in a good way. Big fail by NH.

https://www.mlbtraderumors.com
Are they that desperate to get out from under the remaining $600,000 owed him this year? That's just slightly above the MLB minimum!!!

SCBucco · Post by **SCBucco** » Wed Aug 30, 2017 1:16 am

684548595E4F58181B2A0 wrote: There is a report that the Bucs put both players on irrevocable waivers. I think both can be claimed by another team and the Bucs cannot pull them back.
Doesn't make sense that they would simply waive Nicasio and get no return.

He has been placed on outright waivers according to this ... if so, this is a joke. Could have gotten something for him earlier. Now, they could get nothing only to save 600K. This organization simply amazes me - not in a good way. Big fail by NH.

https://www.mlbtraderumors.com
Are they that desperate to get out from under the remaining $600,000 owed him this year? That's just slightly above the MLB minimum!!!

You forget who owns the team. So, they trade Watson, who was struggling most of the year for two prospects at the trade deadline, but are about to lose their second best reliever on the roster for nothing? Nicascio normally shouldn't bring outrage from fans, but this is another quintessential example of the failures of this organization. I can't wait to see Dog's comment and defense of this.

Ecbucs · Post by **Ecbucs** » Wed Aug 30, 2017 1:26 am

6A7A7B4C5A5A56390 wrote: There is a report that the Bucs put both players on irrevocable waivers. I think both can be claimed by another team and the Bucs cannot pull them back.
Doesn't make sense that they would simply waive Nicasio and get no return.

He has been placed on outright waivers according to this ... if so, this is a joke. Could have gotten something for him earlier. Now, they could get nothing only to save 600K. This organization simply amazes me - not in a good way. Big fail by NH.

https://www.mlbtraderumors.com
would be stupid to do this for Nicasio and not Jaso too. Letting Nicasio go for only a small bit of savings is beyond stupid. Well at least we still have Daniel Hudson to look forward to next year.

JollyRoger · Post by **JollyRoger** » Wed Aug 30, 2017 1:32 am

This is simply inexcusable to throw away your second best reliever. It also depicts an organization that craps on its players. Who the hell would want to sign on to play here? Answer: Nobody of worth

SCBucco · Post by **SCBucco** » Wed Aug 30, 2017 1:53 am

6A4F4C4C59724F474552200 wrote: This is simply inexcusable to throw away your second best reliever. It also depicts an organization that craps on its players. Who the hell would want to sign on to play here? Answer: Nobody of worth

But Dog thinks Cutch should resign here. LOL.

Ecbucs · Post by **Ecbucs** » Wed Aug 30, 2017 2:03 am

4C696A6A7F5469616374060 wrote: This is simply inexcusable to throw away your second best reliever. It also depicts an organization that craps on its players. Who the hell would want to sign on to play here? Answer: Nobody of worth
well craps on players unless they will sign for a discount.