Onlybucs Fan Forums
May 21, 2012, 08:42:46 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Contact Us at administration@onlybucs.net
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Bucs featured in ESPN.com's Hot Stove U Series  (Read 3300 times)
3Up3Down
Pirate Fan
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 33



View Profile
« on: January 29, 2010, 03:33:03 PM »

Great read by ESPN Magazine writer Matt Meyers on the Pirates organizational plan, which he deems the best in baseball.

Nothing really new but it is good to see positive stories about the Bucs especially in January.


http://insider.espn.go.com/mlb/hotstove09/insider/news/story?id=4869229
Logged
CAfan
Pirate Fan
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1515


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: January 29, 2010, 04:03:10 PM »

Can I just state it first.... this guy is obviously a plant by Nutting in the ESPN offices, he is a buffoon for not including Sanchez, Wilson and McLouth in the superstar category, and he failed to even mention the fact that we abandoned the plan when we chose to sign veteran relievers to a one year contract.

Now.. that being said, I like what he is saying.  Its nice to have a plan, and one I happen to believe in.  Maybe it doesn't win a championship (That requires superstars), but should McCutchen and Alvarez pan out, along with a couple of pitchers, we are going to be looking pretty sweet in about a year.
Logged
blackmax
Pirate Fan
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1522



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: January 29, 2010, 04:04:52 PM »

Is it so encouraging that it's worth $7 to read it?
Logged
aso513
Pirate Fan
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2858



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: January 29, 2010, 04:05:21 PM »

I hope you are being sarcastic in saying Wilson, Sanchez, and Mclouth are superstars. And no it isn't worth $7, you've heard it all before.
Logged
Dale Berras Stash
Pirate Fan
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3887


View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: January 29, 2010, 04:15:50 PM »

I hope you are being sarcastic in saying Wilson, Sanchez, and Mclouth are superstars. And no it isn't worth $7, you've heard it all before.

Logged
RJReynolds
Pirate Fan
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 811


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: January 29, 2010, 04:26:29 PM »

Can I just state it first.... this guy is obviously a plant by Nutting in the ESPN offices, he is a buffoon for not including Sanchez, Wilson and McLouth in the superstar category, and he failed to even mention the fact that we abandoned the plan when we chose to sign veteran relievers to a one year contract.

Now.. that being said, I like what he is saying.  Its nice to have a plan, and one I happen to believe in.  Maybe it doesn't win a championship (That requires superstars), but should McCutchen and Alvarez pan out, along with a couple of pitchers, we are going to be looking pretty sweet in about a year.

I think the plan is a good one, but the execution has been hit or miss to this point. A full rebuild this is not. It's better than the half azzed rebuilds that DL gave us. The trades have, for the most part, been ok to good. But giving roster spots to Vazquez, Crosby makes no sense for a rebuilding team, and a guy like Iwamura doesn't make any real sense either. And punting on the top talent in the 2009 draft to pick up a solid if unspectacular catcher in round 1 so that we could spend money on a bunch of pitchers who may possibly profile as back of the rotation starters 6 years from now...I'd like to see them spend even more $$ in this area. Just because they spend $5 mil on our top pick does not stop them from spending what they spent in 2009 on picks 2 and up. The money is there.

I do like the plan, agree with the timing of the trades and (for the most part) the return from them. But there is more that can be done in the draft and IFA areas to bring in even more talent to the PBC.

Shoes
Logged
Woobie
Pirate Fan
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1802



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: January 29, 2010, 04:51:32 PM »

Whose to say ZVR and Cain can't become top of the rotation types?

I'm not sure it will happen, but to label those two -- and some other '09 draft picks -- as No. 4 starters is foolish at this point.
Logged
RJReynolds
Pirate Fan
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 811


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: January 29, 2010, 05:06:00 PM »

Whose to say ZVR and Cain can't become top of the rotation types?

I'm not sure it will happen, but to label those two -- and some other '09 draft picks -- as No. 4 starters is foolish at this point.

To me, if they were obvious top 3 rotation types they would have gotten taken in the first round and would have required substantially more $$ to lure away from college. Certainly they could I'm not saying they won't...and I really do like ZVR. But it is far more likely that they either never pan out at all or end up in the bullpen than they end up a #4-5 starter in the bigs. The chances of them becoming top 3 types are far more remote. I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt by saying back of the rotation types.

And don't get me wrong. These are the types that I want to see the Pirates get into the system. The more we get, the more chance that someone actually hits his ceiling. But I don't want to see it done in place of getting PREMIUM talent into the system, which we are sorely lacking right now. Overdrafting with our first pick to save money for other "decent" prospects is not the way to go. Drafting the best player and spending the $$ with the first pick, then getting a bunch of others later is the way to go. Nutting needs to open up the checkbook even more so that NH can get the best player in round 1 AND the value picks later.

RJR
Logged
aso513
Pirate Fan
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2858



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: January 29, 2010, 05:09:20 PM »

So, in your estimation 7 figure bonuses is not substantial money to lure Cain and ZVR from college. Brilliant. Plus, the Rays have done this for years, do you think it is any coincidence that they have the best pitching depth in baseball?
Logged
RJReynolds
Pirate Fan
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 811


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: January 29, 2010, 05:27:42 PM »

So, in your estimation 7 figure bonuses is not substantial money to lure Cain and ZVR from college. Brilliant. Plus, the Rays have done this for years, do you think it is any coincidence that they have the best pitching depth in baseball?

7 figure bonuses are great for non-first round talent. These are guys that certainly could become major leaguers, and have a far better chance than do players who would not be worth this kind of money. But just as a quick question...have the Rays shyed away from top talent with their #1 picks while going after these types with subsequent picks?

Therein, my friend, lies the rub.

RJR
Logged
agent00
OBN Fantasy Baseball
Pirate Fan
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 276



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: January 29, 2010, 05:29:28 PM »

Probably not, but at least the Pirates sign their first round picks. Tampa Bay failed to do so, with LaVon Washington.
Logged

Ronny Cedeno for 2010 NL MVP!
Dale Berras Stash
Pirate Fan
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3887


View Profile WWW
« Reply #11 on: January 29, 2010, 05:31:58 PM »

Whose to say ZVR and Cain can't become top of the rotation types?

I'm not sure it will happen, but to label those two -- and some other '09 draft picks -- as No. 4 starters is foolish at this point.

To me, if they were obvious top 3 rotation types they would have gotten taken in the first round and would have required substantially more $$ to lure away from college. Certainly they could I'm not saying they won't...and I really do like ZVR. But it is far more likely that they either never pan out at all or end up in the bullpen than they end up a #4-5 starter in the bigs. The chances of them becoming top 3 types are far more remote. I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt by saying back of the rotation types.

And don't get me wrong. These are the types that I want to see the Pirates get into the system. The more we get, the more chance that someone actually hits his ceiling. But I don't want to see it done in place of getting PREMIUM talent into the system, which we are sorely lacking right now. Overdrafting with our first pick to save money for other "decent" prospects is not the way to go. Drafting the best player and spending the $$ with the first pick, then getting a bunch of others later is the way to go. Nutting needs to open up the checkbook even more so that NH can get the best player in round 1 AND the value picks later.

RJR

Let me start by saying that I agree with your premise that we need as much talent in the system as possible.

However....

Last draft, after Strasburg and Ackley, Matzek was the next best talent and Matzek wanted "precedent-setting money" in his father's own words.  To me, that says Josh Beckett-esque major-league contract.  I wanted us to get Matzek, but paying potentially $7M for a HS pitcher and then hamstringing yourself to have him in the majors in 3-4 years is a huge risk.

I championed for us to draft Zack Wheeler as a "safe" pick, albeit still one with high-end potential.

And then Matzek caved in to the Rockies and signed for $3.7M (can't remember exact number).

Alllll that said.....the Pirates did not want to deal with the Turner/Matzek/Purke triumvirate of major-league contracts and huge bonuses, it seems.  They feel that spending first round money is best spent on a bat.  In their opinion, it seems as if Sanchez was that bat.

OK, fine.  I'll take that.

Then they went and signed some tough-sign guys....we know all the names.  If I can read the tea leaves, their thoughts are...."If we get 1 of these guys to the majors and he is a top/middle of the rotation pitcher, we have succeeded.  If we get 2, we are made of pure win."  

They spread their risk out.

In 2008, they put all their eggs in one basket....Pedro.  If he fails, that draft is most likely a failure.  I love D'arnaud, but he is not "impact".  He will "above-average" if everything works out.  And at this point, projecting Miller, Cunningham, et al to be anything more than above-average is premature.

I also believe that, yes, Miguel Sano influenced their draft decisions.  Again, my interpretation, is that they hoped to lock him down on July 2 and then determine who they could still sign/afford to sign from the 2009 draft for a whole month.  When it dragged on, they were sort of twisting in the wind.  In early August, it seems as if they resigned themselves to just signing guys from the 2009 draft and Sano would be a bonus.

I think it stings them bitterly that they lost him.  I think it really burns them inside.  Rene Gayo is crying over red beans as I type this.

However, I am somewhat glad they did not sign Sano as I have always been a vocal proponent against the million dollar Latin babies.  More often than not, you read about how prospect X (Feliz from TEX for example) was signed for $50K or $100K.  I would rather we sign 10 of those types than one Sano.  Too much risk.

Again, all my opinions.

RJR/Tobaccoroad --- healthy dissent is what makes America great.  I thought in light of both Zinn and Salinger passing within 1 day of each other that it bears mentioning that not everyone should think alike.

It's good to have you here.  Just don't kick too much sand on everyone in the sandbox.
« Last Edit: January 29, 2010, 05:34:36 PM by Dale Berras Stash » Logged
RJReynolds
Pirate Fan
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 811


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: January 29, 2010, 05:37:49 PM »

Probably not, but at least the Pirates sign their first round picks. Tampa Bay failed to do so, with LaVon Washington.

Pick #30 not quite as important as pick #4. Just sayin'.

RJR
Logged
thegreatchris
OBN Fantasy Baseball
Pirate Fan
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1011



View Profile
« Reply #13 on: January 29, 2010, 05:42:49 PM »

LeVon Washington is a likely top-10 pick this year. Just sayin'.
Logged
RJReynolds
Pirate Fan
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 811


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: January 29, 2010, 05:49:58 PM »

I get what you're saying DBS. My main point is simply that paying a Matzek that $7 mil (which as you said wasn't close to what it actually ending up taking to sign him) should not preclude the Pirates from spending another $5-6 mil or more elsewhere. And I know that this drives people here insane, but it bears repeating. Paying Ramon Vazquez takes $4 mil over a 2 year period away from the possibility to spend it in other, more productive ways. Is it better to pay Vazquez in 2008-2009 or to get Grossman/Miller/ZVR/Cain all into the fold? The cost is the same. I would personally rather see a $20 mil major league payroll and $20 mil go into the draft budget for the next 2-3 years. Now you're talking some serious talent influx and depth. No?

RJR
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.13 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Site hosted by Royal Technology Management

Page created in 0.168 seconds with 19 queries.