Onlybucs Fan Forums
May 21, 2012, 07:09:21 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Contact Us at administration@onlybucs.net
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Ramon Vazquez ????  (Read 1108 times)
pops08
Pirate Fan
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 454



View Profile
« on: December 11, 2008, 12:13:29 PM »

a pretty expensive replacement spare part...

left handed hitting, shortstop, 32
Logged

America has rolled by like an army of steamrollers. It's been erased like a blackboard, rebuilt, and erased again. But baseball has marked the time. This field, this game, is a part of our past. It reminds us of all that once was good, and it could be again.
by-the-Sea
Pirate Fan
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 578


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: December 11, 2008, 12:39:52 PM »

Please define expensive.  I haven't seen dollar numbers yet....
Logged
Dignan
Pirate Fan
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 668


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: December 11, 2008, 12:45:36 PM »

Please define expensive.  I haven't seen dollar numbers yet....

Quote
LAS VEGAS -- The Pirates are close to signing free-agent utility infielder Ramon Vazquez to a two-year, $4 million contract, ESPN's Buster Olney is reporting this morning.

Not independently confirmed.

Vazquez, 32, batted .290 with six home runs and 40 RBIs for the Texas Rangers last season. He made $810,000.

http://community.post-gazette.com/blogs/pbc/default.aspx

Personally I don't care what they spend as long as they're improving the team and showing a tendency to do the right things.
Logged
Pizza Man
Pirate Fan
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 60


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: December 11, 2008, 12:47:10 PM »

Is this improving the team?
Logged
Dignan
Pirate Fan
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 668


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: December 11, 2008, 12:55:53 PM »

Is this improving the team?

It depends on whether you think Vazquez is better than Luis Rivas.  What do you think?
Logged
BadAndy
Pirate Fan
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1003


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: December 11, 2008, 12:57:01 PM »

Is this improving the team?

Vasquez > Bixler, Cruz, Rivas, and Gomez COMBINED

Who'd you expect Adam Dunn?
Logged

I'd rather be known in Bucco Nation as a knowledgeable diehard than a clueless casual fan.
by-the-Sea
Pirate Fan
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 578


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: December 11, 2008, 01:08:38 PM »

So 2M/year for an experienced backup middle infielder...

We've certainly seen money spent less-wisely. 
Logged
ECBucs
Pirate Fan
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2438


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: December 11, 2008, 01:29:47 PM »

I would rather have had Mark Loretta.  I don't see that Vazquez is an improvement over Lorretta and don't see why his contract is larger.
Logged
Benji6
Pirate Fan
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 483


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: December 11, 2008, 01:34:57 PM »

I would rather have had Mark Loretta.  I don't see that Vazquez is an improvement over Lorretta and don't see why his contract is larger.

It could be a simple matter of possible playing time for Loretta vs. the ability to play closer to home (I think he's from California), plus the ability to play on a team that is projected to be a contender.
Logged

Larry
Will
Pirate Fan
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1205


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: December 11, 2008, 02:49:43 PM »

I would rather have had Mark Loretta.  I don't see that Vazquez is an improvement over Lorretta and don't see why his contract is larger.

It could be a simple matter of possible playing time for Loretta vs. the ability to play closer to home (I think he's from California), plus the ability to play on a team that is projected to be a contender.

And it also could have been a matter of being unsure about Loretta's ability to handle the shortstop position defensively at his age. He has not had an above-average season there defensively since 2000.
Logged
magnumo
Pirate Fan
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 976


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: December 11, 2008, 04:25:27 PM »

It is of note that Vazquez had been playing primarily at 3B for the past three seasons:

2006: 14 games at 3B; 7 at SS; 7 at 2B
2007: 71 games at 3B; 19 at SS; 13 at 2B; 7 at 1B
2008: 70 games at 3B; 26 at SS; 11 at 2B; 1 at 1B

3-year totals: 155 games at 3B; 52 at SS; 31 at 2B; 8 at 1B

This guy looks like Chris-Gomez-light.  Hopefully, he can still play middle infield.  At any rate, if it happens, this does not appear to be a significant move.
Logged
Dogknot3
Pirate Fan
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6122


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: December 11, 2008, 04:45:58 PM »

I hope this move means they can sign some power bats to fill out the bench and not another back up infielder.  I don't see a reason to have two back up middle infielders who can't hit for power.  I want another "Mark Smith" type on the bench.
Logged
Pizza Man
Pirate Fan
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 60


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: December 11, 2008, 04:49:25 PM »

Are they any of those power bats out there?
Logged
CAfan
Pirate Fan
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1515


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: December 11, 2008, 04:52:40 PM »

He can still play SS which I think is important for this team.  Bixler will be in AAA unless perhaps Wilson gets moved, then they might give bixler another shot, but I don't see them having an inexperienced backup.

Guys like Vazquez, Mintky, Michaels are nice to have because they can step in with limited time and be ready. Lots of young players struggle with that.
Logged
Benji6
Pirate Fan
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 483


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: December 11, 2008, 07:16:29 PM »

It is of note that Vazquez had been playing primarily at 3B for the past three seasons:

2006: 14 games at 3B; 7 at SS; 7 at 2B
2007: 71 games at 3B; 19 at SS; 13 at 2B; 7 at 1B
2008: 70 games at 3B; 26 at SS; 11 at 2B; 1 at 1B

3-year totals: 155 games at 3B; 52 at SS; 31 at 2B; 8 at 1B

This guy looks like Chris-Gomez-light.  Hopefully, he can still play middle infield.  At any rate, if it happens, this does not appear to be a significant move.




I wouldn't necessarily worry about this.  Taking at least the last two years into consideration when he played with the Rangers, third base is where they had a hole to play him.  Their double play combination of Ian Kinsler and Michael Young really didn't miss much time.  Meanwhile, third base for them seemed like a black hole.  I think, in looking at the Rangers numbers at third last year, Chris Shelton even made an appearance there.
Logged

Larry
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.13 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Site hosted by Royal Technology Management

Page created in 0.154 seconds with 19 queries.